Petermann Bédat Ref. 1967: A New Independent Star's Debut
Independents

Petermann Bédat Ref. 1967: A New Independent Star's Debut

By Spencer Karrington · Jun 18, 2020 · 32 replies
Spencer Karrington
WPS member · Independents forum
32 replies4380 views4 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Spencer Karrington introduces the Petermann Bédat Ref. 1967, a significant release from the independent watchmaking duo. His initial post provides crucial specifications and early insights into the design philosophy behind this deadbeat seconds timepiece. This article delves into the community's first impressions and expert analysis of Petermann Bédat's debut.

Here are some details and photos of the watch


Case Diameter : 39.00 mm.

- Thickness of the case : 10.70 mm.

- Movement diameter : 30.00 mm.

- Jewels : 29

- Movement : Dead beat second in-house hand winding mechanical movement. caliber 171.

- Power reserve : 36H

- Frequency : 18'000 alt/hour

- Limited to: 10 pieces white gold

                      10 pieces rose gold


"The Ref 1967 chapter I
Our new semi-open dial has been thought to highlight the craftsmanship.
The central plate cut-outs are designed to frame the nicely sized rubies, as they are one of the vital elements of the movement.
Made by Comblémine the dial has been designed by @barth.studio .
The two prototypes are ready and visible by appointment.
Real pictures will (very) soon follow"


Let me know what you guys think!!














Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MI
MichaelC
Jun 18, 2020

The 3 just about disappears, but the work below does look fantastic. I like the case and lugs.

WA
WatchAl
Jun 18, 2020

Hard to determine from the photos, but is that brushed steel on the dial? I’m particularly fascinated by the WG version, placement of the jeweled bearings on the dial are a gem to look at. Would love to see the movement and clasp. Looking forward to your photos. -Alan

NW
nwk00
Jun 18, 2020

This dial should be seen as a ring and a transparent dial with 4 indices. It's a bit like Roger Smith's series 5 though the indices on that watch is smaller. Either solution will have detractors.

GE
Gelato Monster
Jun 18, 2020

get rid of the 3,6, 9,12 and make a perfect ring of nakedness

VI
VinnieD
Jun 19, 2020

I hate it when there are medallions, numbers etc. on transparent plates.

CO
cory
Jun 19, 2020

There is much more contrast between the 3 and open works and it is not so distractive. I think it works nicely. Hats off to both gents for a stellar creation.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Independents forum with 32 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →