Ochs und Junior: Ludwig Oechslin's Vision
Independents

Ochs und Junior: Ludwig Oechslin's Vision

By Ornatus-Mundi · Dec 21, 2008 · 28 replies
Ornatus-Mundi
WPS member · Independents forum
28 replies15062 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Ornatus-Mundi's detailed post introduces Ochs und Junior, a cooperative founded by Ludwig Oechslin and Beat Weinmann, dedicated to a unique philosophy of watchmaking. This article delves into Oechslin's intellectual approach, emphasizing practical utility, reduction to essentials, and an 'archaic beauty' aesthetic. It's a foundational piece for understanding the brand's innovative spirit and its commitment to conceptual clarity over conventional complexity.

Dear All:

in my earlier posts I promised to show the pictures of the two prototypes. Now I am set to deliver. But first, I would like to reflect a bit more on the concept and reason behind Ochs und Junior and why it necessitated the establishment of a new cooperative :


The Ox and the Junior: Ludwig Oechslin and Beat Weinmann


As I alluded to in my previous posts, Oechslin's intellectual approach to watchmaking is that of synthesis. His analysis of clockworks and complications focusses on practical utility and the reduction to the bare essentials. Simplicity and logic draw the red line in his thinking.

What does this mean in praxis? The foundation is a different understanding of complexity. In common watchmaking approaches, complexity is understood as a function of indications (representing the technical capacity of a watch) and the sum of parts (the watchmaking equivalent of the first).

Oechslin goes a different path. He understands complexity as the intellectual challenge to distill the essence of a mechanism into a conceptually clear product. The resulting gear systems often are of strikingly simple construction, but endowed with a transcendent, ethereal elegance. Complexity with actually fewer (!) components means that those have to fulfill multiple tasks at the same time. And that is indeed a challenge! Let's take the central switch wheel of the MIH watch as an example:


The 3-layer column wheel of the MIH watch's annual calender mechanism


This little wheel is a role model of the extend Oechslin strives for with his synthesis: It orchestrates the annual calender of the MIH watch and has three functional layers: Layer 1 couples the weekday disk with the month disk, layer 2 is driven by a stud plate on the hours wheel of the base movement, and layer 3 advances the date under certain conditions - in months with only 30 days. At the end of these months, the date is advanced by the existing date mechanisms of the base movement and by the hours wheel via weekday and months switch.

Much to his amusement, it seems to be impossible (or at least discouragingly difficult) to transform the fruits of Vico's constructional intransigence into actual watches. Oechslin constructs without tolerances. The fact that the annual calender of the MIH, comprising of only 9 additional moving parts, has not yet been used by another brand although this is encouraged, is a telling sign.

So, if Oechslin wanted to stay true to his ideas without compromise, he would have to fully control the entire process.

Another important aspect is Vico's specific sense for aesthetics, which can be described with a passion for 'archaic beauty'. Watches are not luxury objects for him at all, but tools suitable for everyday use. Artifacts which give account of their manufacturing process and their history of use. The prototypes he produced himself illustrate this aptly. Here are pictures of the early protoypes for the MIH watch and the new Ochs und Junior watches, the Anno 50 and the Settimana Junior:


Oechslin's protoype of the MIH watch...

...and of the Ochs und Junior Anno 50 (left) and Settimana Junior (right)


So how to put this concepts and thinking, which are certainly not compatible with widespread notions of fine watchmaking, into praxis?

Vico took Beat Weinmann, with whom he realised the MIH project, aside and asked him: "Do you want to establish a watch manufacturer together with me?". This was a question you don't hear often, and Ludwig does not pose such questions twice...

Thus, Ochs und Junior was born! It was clear to both that the new watch cooperative cannot be a 'brand' in the traditional sense of the term. They wanted something different.



Sustainability is the key word here. It has multiple meanings for Ochs und Junior and is embodied throughout the cooperative:

Quite naturally, Ochs und Junior does not consider themselves as a 'brand' (see above). 'Branding' comes from animal husbandry where cattle and other livestock were burned the owner's signature into the hide (herds from several farmers were often mixed and jointly watched by one shepherd). Today, a 'brand' is often much more than the product(s), brands are associated with a certain lifestyle, convey membership to a certain social (elite?) group and serve to recognise a product on the global markets.

Ludwig wanted to let only the watches speak for themselves. Thus, the Ochs und Junior watches do not feature any brand logo, yet Oechslin makes ironical reference to the historical importance of branded stigmas (did he have a choice? After all, his family name is ancient German for 'little ox'...) in that he created an indentor to heat-glue the Ochs und Junior logo into the back side of the straps:


Ludwig and Giorgio Oechslin 'branding' an Ochs und Junior watch

The indentor and the result

The indentors also mark the business paper...


This shall suffice for now. In the following, I will finally show the watches!



More posts later today!

Cheers, Magnus

 

This message has been edited by AnthonyTsai on 2008-12-24 10:15:14

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
OR
Ornatus-Mundi
Dec 21, 2008

Dear All: One word in advance. The watches depicted below are prototypes, however, they are very true to the final watches. Please remember that the watches shall not hide their production processes... The first watch to present is the Anno 50 , and annual calender watch with a new mechanism developed by Ludwig Oechslin. While the MIH watch already was a much applauded and celebrated annual calender (calenders which automatically take into account the different month lengths except February, whe

OR
Ornatus-Mundi
Dec 21, 2008

Dear All: Have you ever seen a serious watch for the youngsters? A watch which is not made in China? With traceable components, completely safe to use and representing no health hazard? A watch which would be a true companion for all your kid's adventures? Actually, the impetus for this came from Heinz Forrer, at Vacheron Constantin responsible for the Swiss market. As Beat has two kids, Anne-Sophie and Jerome, he was immediately taken. A few weeks after Beat told Ludwig all this, another protot

AN
AnthonyTsai
Dec 21, 2008

You sure did tease us but glad to see the cat is out of the bag. I really like the Settimana Junior watch because of the bright orange and it'll be useful to teach kids the days of the week. Wish the Anno 50 had a little more color to it. Thanks for sharing these Ludwig Oechslin creations with us! Cheers, Anthony

DO
DonCorson
Dec 21, 2008

I am still trying to get my head around these examples of complexity simplified with workshop industrial design and playful displays. The Ochs is amainsing! Just down that I wasn''t invited to the party too ! Don

OR
Ornatus-Mundi
Dec 21, 2008

Dear All: finally in my last post I would like to present to you the people who are behind the Ochs und Junior project. It is, as you might have expected, the project of a couple of friends. (i) Ludwig Oechslin: The arch-ox and mastermind behind all this. The thinker, the creator. Philosopher, watchmaker and historian. Curator of the Musée International d'horlogierie (MIH) in La-Chaud-de.-Fonds. The only one who ever was allowed to touch the Farnesian clock in the Vatican. This clock never reall

NI
nickd
Dec 21, 2008

I love the children's, but the Anno 50 seems to be closer to kinetic sculpture than a way of indicating the calendar. Assuming the dial remains as it is, without numbers, then we have the strange combination of a high-precision annual calendar mechanism coupled to an ultra-low precision display. Telling the date at a glance is probably impossible, even once you're used to it, and given that the 31 days are a horrible map onto the 12 hour markers, you're probably going to end up counting more oft

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Independents forum with 28 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →