
Nicolas (amanico) presents a captivating visual comparison of three Chopard L.U.C Full Strike minute repeaters, inviting collectors to delve into the nuances of their design and technical execution. His post highlights the superlative craftsmanship across platinum, steel, and sapphire iterations, prompting a discussion on aesthetic preferences and horological details. This article synthesizes community insights, offering a deeper appreciation for these remarkable timepieces.


For me of the three the one in the centre is my favourite as I am really attracted to grey dialled watches and if I'm being honest although it is technically brilliant my least favourite is the sapphire version as it just does not have the same appeal for me and I think the dial looks messy. Marc
I think the clarity of LUC chime remains on top...with the Crystal gongs the sound remains 'crystal clear' ;-) having said that, Patek is pleasing as an overall package. Best, mahesh.,
And the weight is probably nicer than platinum for such a watch, which isnโt small. Also, Iโve had the chance to handle the carburised steel variant and itโs really nice in real life.
However, Roman numerals just don't work for me, so in this case the skeletonized sapphire would be my choice. The movement is truly a feast for the eyes! Thanks for sharing. M4
But I have heard from knowledgeable collectors that the platinum sounds the best. Which would be very surprising for a traditional repeater but here the sound comes from the crystal and somehow the higher density helps.
I have only experienced the rose gold (tourbillion one) and it sounded amazing.
This thread is active on the Chopard forum with 38 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →