
sham1 provides a rare, candid review of the Charles Frodsham watch, a piece few collectors have seen firsthand. His detailed observations on wearability, finishing, and pricing offer crucial insights into this independent brand's debut wristwatch. The post sparks a discussion on the challenges and unique appeal of emerging independent watchmakers in a competitive market.



But I don't buy chronometers, looking like historical chronometers, as dress watches. I think of them as expensive (in some cases very expensive) (pun intended) tool watches. They can look handsome or attractive; and they can be worn in any situation or for any occasion. But then so can chronographs and dive watches. The latter two are not dress watches. As for the Frodsham, I think you're right that this piece is more for the person who has several other high-end/exclusive independents, and is
you have a vivid imagination but I have to confess that I did see my name in Frodsham and wanted to like this watch more than I did due to the name!! But as you can see from the photo below of Charles Frodsham, I bear no resemblance to the gentleman!
DNA testing would be the route to go.
If the test comes out positive and I find out Mr Frodsham was naughty during his expedition to Malaya, you will be the first to know as I will need a good lawyer!!
We'll discuss the fee upon completion of the testing.
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 97 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →