
sham1 provides a rare, candid review of the Charles Frodsham watch, a piece few collectors have seen firsthand. His detailed observations on wearability, finishing, and pricing offer crucial insights into this independent brand's debut wristwatch. The post sparks a discussion on the challenges and unique appeal of emerging independent watchmakers in a competitive market.



But I don't buy chronometers, looking like historical chronometers, as dress watches. I think of them as expensive (in some cases very expensive) (pun intended) tool watches. They can look handsome or attractive; and they can be worn in any situation or for any occasion. But then so can chronographs and dive watches. The latter two are not dress watches. As for the Frodsham, I think you're right that this piece is more for the person who has several other high-end/exclusive independents, and is
But like you said at that price there are numbers of more extraordinary watch
Beautiful movement. Thanks for sharing. Vte
Not too many folks have had a chance to see this piece firsthand, and I appreciate your earnest feedback. One feature that recommends the watch is the fashion in which the caliber architecture has been chosen to give equal precedence to engineering and art design. The bridges, drive train, and the highly-stylized balance structure are mote than the result of CAD/CAM work to assemble the parts in the most expedient manner. "Finishing" a watch caliber is one method of imparting aesthetic excellenc
But like you said , there are some great other watches for sale at that price point too . Thanks for the post and pictures my friend 👍🏻🤗
As I understand, if the watch even runs out of power, the movement can be damaged. This is why the pr is cut off at 35 hr. This seems like the idea of an English gentleman's watch, not the dress watch concept. It's supposed to be distinguished by being big or thick (I was told that's why RWS watches are so thick), but not show off with extra finishing or something... Not sure if it's for me, but I do like RWS and this as well. And may I say again, thanks for sharing, Sham!
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 97 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →