
Peter (pfang56) presents a unique dilemma for Audemars Piguet collectors: whether two highly similar, yet distinct, ceramic Royal Oak Perpetual Calendars can coexist in a single collection. His post invites the community to weigh in on the aesthetic and historical considerations of owning both the groundbreaking 26579CE and the more recent 26585CE skeletonized variant. This discussion explores the nuances of collecting within a specific reference, highlighting the subtle differences that can justify or preclude redundancy for discerning enthusiasts.



Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Selfwinding Reference 26579
The reference 26579 represents Audemars Piguet's Royal Oak Selfwinding in a 41mm configuration, positioning it within the brand's contemporary automatic collection. This reference features a blue dial combined with stainless steel construction, offering the Royal Oak Selfwinding in an accessible precious metal alternative.
The 41mm stainless steel case houses the automatic caliber 4302 movement, providing a 70-hour power reserve. The watch features a fixed octagonal bezel characteristic of the Royal Oak design, complemented by sapphire crystal protection. Water resistance extends to 50 meters, and the watch is completed with a matching steel bracelet.
Produced from 2022 onward, the reference 26579 appeals to collectors seeking a modern Royal Oak Selfwinding with substantial wrist presence and extended power reserve capabilities. The blue dial configuration provides visual distinction within the selfwinding range, while the steel construction offers durability for regular wear. This reference serves collectors prioritizing contemporary Audemars Piguet craftsmanship in the established Royal Oak format.
I guess the way I think of it - is that if I have a hankering for a ceramic perpetual, it seems that naturally I will go for the skeleton one. They are different but I am not able to pull of double wristed yet!! Cheers Peter
I do on occasion get two examples of things that I really like - the difference in the dial alone may make it easier. Cheers Peter
Ha ha, kidding if course. I actually prefer the solid dial as I feel it is my only hope to read with aging eyes. On topic, I would seriously keep one and choose something different in place of the other. It's a great situation to contemplate!
I am leaning slightly to trade up with the original ceramic perpetual, simply because, except for legibility, the skeleton is a nice upgrade on multiple fronts - skeletonization as well as finishing is another level. Cheers Peter
This thread is active on the Audemars Piguet forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →