Ornatus-Mundi[Zenith]
7136
They are two different animals altogether...
with a similar outer shell.
The Chronograph offers a very fine, albeit relatively 'common' (take this with a grain of salt!), chronograph movement with a quite unique implementation: The case construction is such that the pushers can be operated under water, an aspect absent on most other chronograph watches. Blancpain gave the functionality top priority when designing this watch!

The time only is the pure, historic Fifty Fathoms, with a dedicated, robust 5 day movement (with three barrels, freesprung hairspring). A modern watch entirely true to its roots. Congrats Blancpain, an instant, modern classic! This is the original version of the modern Fifty Fathoms legacy, and rightfully so. It can't get better, no matter what complications they ever will put in this case!

A tough decision, but I would follow my two previous posters as well!
Best,
Magnus
Depends what you like
By: mcklof : January 12th, 2010-13:10
I would think that you'd have to spend some time with both on your wrist. It all comes down to personal preference. If the standard FF on the bracelet didn't immediately appeal to you, well, I'm not one to risk throwing down that much cash hoping that the...
STANDARD FF
By: grigo : January 12th, 2010-13:11
I would suggest the standard FF as opposed to the Chrono. I have the Chrono and I love it, but in the back of my mind I always wonder why I didn't get the standard FF the dial of which in its simplicity is just beautiful. Regards, George
insight
By: infntryco : January 12th, 2010-13:38
I havent done my research, so far only based on looks, and so I did not know the chrono was not inhouse. I like the busier dial of a chronograph, but the simplicity of the non chrono is both appealing and a turn off for me, it looks nice and clean but it ...
Well, George
By: amanico : January 12th, 2010-13:49
Since you were deceived with the Rolex GMT, I would be tempted to tell you to go on the FF Chrono. BUT, personally, I would go on the simpler FF. For its cleaner look. For its superb movement, which is derivated from the magnificient 13 RO. For its sapphi...
chrono
By: infntryco : January 12th, 2010-15:47
I think I am going to check out the Chronograph. I am crossed between the two but I think I am leaning towards the Chrono I like the busier dial I might have to save heritage and simplicity for later.
Chrono was my choice
By: tcollins : January 12th, 2010-19:31
I faced the same dilemma that you are now dealing with two years ago. Since I didn't already have a chrono in my collection I went with the FF Chrono. Love the watch, it is one of my "regulars" and I love playing with the chrono function. If I had went wi...
I also agree....
By: MiniCooper : January 13th, 2010-11:41
with Nicolas, Magnus & Oliver.... I used to own the chrono....but I traded for the simple (black) version.... I think that the simple version has a cleaner look while the chrono was, in the long run, too busy... The SS version has a classic look while the...
both
By: infntryco : January 14th, 2010-00:20
I will probably end up getting both but first the chrono, then I will get the normal FF when I feel ready. I have seen the air command but the dial is a bit too busy, I think the FF chrono is perfect. and I can only go simpler from their.