Marv
356
Nothing personal
My remark was just a precision that echoed other posts, in which this new Tribute to FF was incorrectly associated to other re-issues (such as the Longines Greenlander) for which the date had been added without respect for the original models.
The Date is ruining the beauty of the watch, IMO.
Let's compare it with a Bunde... What do you think? The size, if it bis 45 mm, is not a problem as we saw it with the former 2007 release. I regret the presence of the date... Best, Nicolas...
You.....
are right my friend.... then again, you are an expert on vintage FFs..... cheers
100% agreed. like the longines greenlander.
what is the homeage? among the homeage, I vote for polaris 65/68 and portuguese 1939 so far.
... maybe there is hope ...
and there will be little changes before the final product leaves the factory. There have been changes (e.g. date windows) in the past My vote would be: no date, in this case
Thanks for the live picture!
It's a great effort, sans the date window. I still really don't understand why such a re-edition needs a date display, but I suppose there are some people who can't live without one. Cheers, Daos
I´m dreaming now!
I´m dreaming about a nice Milspec and No Rad Re-edition! But.... PLEASE... Whitout Date....PLEASE Best Emilio
I know a Bunde owner who may be happy, now... :)
This message has been edited by amanico on 2010-03-19 12:27:51
Lolol, Hermano!
Yes, I know a really happy Bunde owner! Best, my dear Nico. Emilio, aka Matador!
I thought exactly it, Nico :)
I must admit that I have two feelings... One feeling is really good, because always is great that some brands re-edited legendary watches. I only hope, in this case, see a nice Milspec re-edition, for example. It´d be a perfect duo with my vintage Mi...
Size?
It certainly is reminiscent of the past, which is good, in my book. I wish/hope it's smaller than 45 mm though. A forlorn hope?
I reserve my opinion until I can see the definitive watch in real
I am not really convinced by the photo of this tribute, but I reserve my opinion until I can see the definitive watch in real. Regarding the date/no date issue, I can understand that one may prefer without. But I don't get why the date would be invalid or...
Nice effort
I am very surprised that Blancpain has made the connection to there military past. I think they have such a rich history in vintage military watches that they could really market to the public.
Of course the watch existed, and that it is legitimate to have a
New " No Rad " with the date, but it is a matter of taste, and indeed a personal and subjective point of view, Marv. Without date, TO ME, it would have been a more attractive watch. Just my point of view, indeed. Best, Nicolas
Nothing personal
My remark was just a precision that echoed other posts, in which this new Tribute to FF was incorrectly associated to other re-issues (such as the Longines Greenlander) for which the date had been added without respect for the original models.
Certanlly, many more No Rad models were built with date than without...
Marv, indeed, this re-ed is close to some No Rad with date watches. Certanlly, there were more variants with date than without (the Bunde, for example). It´s a matter of taste: I prefer these diver watches without date: Longines Diver, Omega Seamaste...
Tempted
I must say that i am tempted to go out an place an order asap. I'm not that worried by the date, times do change. George