claude.f
195
Hey Stephan.....
I don't think so that it is a different bezel. It's not a studio photograph and you can see that the watch is strongly lighted by the sun.
I think these are only reflections from the steel borders of the bezel. Also the whole watch and the bezel looks not round but oval and the black insert is much smaller on different places (3 and 9 o'clock)
The losange from the inlay, put at the 3 o'clock position, can only seen half!
Another indication of reflections is that you even cannot see the crown clearly.
But of course I am not certain and maybe Mr. Bridges got a special small bezel for his FF.
Sure is, that it is the big sized FF with the 3/6/9/12 dial without moisture indication. IMO there is only a one line printing at 6 o'clock on the dial, so that's what makes me believe in the 1000ft.
regards
Claude
This message has been edited by claude.f on 2010-02-03 17:02:00
Aaah, the 1 000 Feet!
By: amanico : January 31st, 2010-23:26
A strong and nice looking watch! Powerful, yet elegant with its 3 / 6 / 9 / 12 dial, its rectangular thin index markers, and its losange bezel, it is a watch to have in a nice FF Collection... Like yours! Thanks for this post, and ofr using this amazingly...
wow
By: fifty fathoms : February 3rd, 2010-12:09
thank you again Claude, very interesting report. The watch on the magazine has a different bezel than yours. The outer metal ring seems much wider than yours and the bakelite inlay seems to be smaller, like on a military version ???? regards Stephan
Hey Stephan.....
By: claude.f : February 3rd, 2010-17:00
I don't think so that it is a different bezel. It's not a studio photograph and you can see that the watch is strongly lighted by the sun. I think these are only reflections from the steel borders of the bezel. Also the whole watch and the bezel looks not...