reficul_x
184
Exactly. I always have the...
Exactly.
I always have the impression that since these 2 watches (sub & FF) were made based on the specification of the military, it made sense for the round indexes to be the first.
But I'm surprised certain articles said otherwise. Hmmm.
Best Rgds
Jack
Sent from my mammoth Android device
Pardon me on any typo
www watchprosite <[Email address suppressed for privacy]> wrote:
Alert from: www:watchprosite
Posted By: amanico (registered) on January 27th, 2013 - 03:46
Title: I was never able to say which one of these 2 dials ( Round indexes or 3 / 6 / 9 / 12 )
Thanks Nicholas!
By: reficul_x : January 26th, 2013-01:03
And its also thanks to you that I am able to own this watch. You're a great contributor, getting me so addicted to this BP FF because of your write ups, etc. JLC moderator? hmmm... might want to change that. ;-) Thanks again and look forward to hear from ...
there is a very good...
By: reficul_x : January 26th, 2013-02:16
there is a very good reason why I am NOT reading those Polaris and Deep sea alarm for a while. Do you know how madly in love I was with this BP and the pain of not owning it for more than a year? Thanks for the kind words Nicholas. :) Best Rgds Jack Sen...
Nice watch
By: ddaniel : January 26th, 2013-04:18
But the statement " Likely one of the earliest BP seen, with one of the lowest found serial number of 112X" sounds a bit bold to say the least ;-) You may want to have a look at this post, for instance... amp;fi=4&pi=4181476&ti=663126&msid=&am...
Hi Jack
By: ddaniel : January 27th, 2013-03:03
Hi Jack, I was just trying to point out a handful of really easy to source much lower serial numbered specimens, in case they could be of any use in your "little research". In fact, so easy to find they were posted right here in this very same forum. But ...