BDLJ
4653
Craftsmen since 1636...
That trumps the current 1735 claims...
Given the stylised drawinq with its rather strange angles...I'd say it's artistic-licence.
Interesting vintage advert
By: Ubik : November 19th, 2010-06:48
Stumbled across this advert, not seen this one before, has anyone else? (credit -- Skin diving history) The thing that obviously leaps out is the inverted 30, a mistake on the drawing? Or a sign they were used later than thought? This message has been edi...
i understand
By: mr : November 21st, 2010-15:48
that $90 was a large some of money during that time. I meant that it was interesting to see how inflation has changed what $90 could do back then and what it can do today. For instance, the add states that a Fifty Fathoms costs $90, but today it is around...
Ooops.
By: BDLJ : November 21st, 2010-16:06
Please mr, any misunderstanding is purely due to my bad typing. I definitely didn't mean to suggest ingnorance or disrespect... I completely agree with your comments. Back in the early 60s, Regulators were $50ish. Compasses around $15, a mask a few dollar...
no apologies required
By: mr : November 21st, 2010-16:15
i thought that my first comment was the one that was disrespectful/ignorant. Its good to see that we are both on the same understanding I agree that the current FF's price is mostly due to its "luxury watch" status, additionally, it is a lot more than dou...
Ah, my mistake
By: billy1 : November 24th, 2010-14:50
You're referring to the cost of a Blancpain today, not that $90 equates to $10K in today's money. My apologies for my misunderstanding. It is interesting to note that what a Blancpain (vintage type) would cost today. Kind regards, B.
Is it an early dial?
By: Ubik : November 19th, 2010-07:23
It's different to the other ads I've seen. All the inverted 30s I've seen have a triangle on the bezel while this one shows the diamond. Also is this the earlier 3/6/9 dial with the large lumed triangles under the numerals? The other interesting thing is ...