ThomasM
[PuristS]
14331
ah, I just realized...
Hi, Jon,
I knew I recognized your handle from somewhere, past threads, but I couldn't place where.
I just realized you had asked a question about "the Big Three" and I responded (necessarily briefly; I was travelling in London and Switzerland at the time) and then never got back to that topic/thread.
First, forgive my bad memory.
Second, apologies to leave that topic hanging.
I've taken a quick look at that thread again and if you are still interested, I do feel there is a bit more to add to the subject - nothing that would change any of the points made, just a bit more "historical context."
Keep in mind that "catch phrases" are a product of their times (as are designs; as are brand images; as are...und so weiter)
So it seems a natural segue in this thread.
Knowing the historical context can be helpful, but again, it doesn't change, necessarily, one's perceptions or point of view.
Afterall, Hitler wasn't such a bad guy in 1928...
Cheers,
TM
(apologies to anyone who thinks Hitler is a sacred subject, for good or evil)
Is RO 15300 too seventies looking?
I hope I don't offend any RO lovers out there. For a brief period of time I owned a 15300. I could not get past how it looked on my wrist. I know it is a classic designed by Genta but is it stuck in time. As a relative new comer to the world of horology I...
Out of the 3 of the 70's watches....
Hello IMO, of the 3 watches from the 70's (AP, PP, VC) the RO design has aged extremely well. I liken the AP RO to a 911! ozbronx33, what other sports watches do you wear? -MW
I have....
I have a Rolex ND Sub and a Patek 5196. Want a GMT IIC badly. I had a LV, had a Navitimer World ( too big) also sold my 15300.
Royal Oak simple beauty...
The Royal Oak is one of the the most successful watch designs of all time. It is classically simple, not overdone, a lasting tribute to knowing when to stop and leave the design stand on it's own. The way the light reflects of the bracelet never ceases to...
I have to agree with Jeff
I like the Royal Oak design, not necessarily the 15300. Besides, I think that the 70s are back in watch design, meaning smaller diameters on three handed watches. The only problem I have with 15300 is the chunky bracelet. This message has been edited by r...
actually, the 1970's are characterized by...
large, chunky watches (think the variants Omega Speedmasters and Seamasters, Zenith, Heuers of the day; even the Favre-Leuba Bathy which were actually released in the 1960's...) - the Royal Oak (and Nautilus and VC 222) was/were the more elegant yet still...
I think the 15300/15202 are timeless ...
I love my 15300. Of course, loving or disliking a design is very subjective. Same as ozbronx33, I love the Rolex GMT Master, and managed to buy a new IIc SS last month. Indeed, last Thursday I wore the 15300 on one wrist, GMT IIc on the other. I was a bit...
if this helps . . .
I don't think it looks like a 70s watch, and I'm attuned to the issue because I think the Nautilus does look like a 70s watch and wouldn't buy it for that reason. And I would have bought the 15300 in a heartbeat if the bracelet had fit my wrist, but it di...
"Nautilus does look like a 70's watch...
Hi, Not agreeing or disagreeing (such matters have no "objective truth" just general consensus) but I'm curious what about the Nautilus reminds you of '70's designs? The blocky, chunky Omegas and Zenith and Heuers share a common design aesthetic (as well ...
I really have no idea
There's just something about that gratuitous wing and the port-hole shape; it looks "experimental" in that goofy, groovy 70s way. Or so it strikes me; other people will of course have completely different reactions.
that's actually not a "gratuitous wing..."
Hi, Far be it for me to "defend" the Nautilus, but those "wings" are actually functional - one side actually serves as a hinge to "lock" the case together. It's actually a pretty complicated, sophisticated case design. Whether one likes it aesthetically i...
fair enough
But I'm guessing they didn't really need to append that thing to the watch; they created a complicated hinge mechanism as a justification for the groovy design. Function following 70s form.
um...
knowing what I do about the design specifics and history, I'm afraid you're wrong. But it really isn't that big a deal; this is the AP forum, afterall, not PP... Cheers, TM ps: boy, did I miss something all this time, or are you just really cynical? I've ...
ah, I just realized...
Hi, Jon, I knew I recognized your handle from somewhere, past threads, but I couldn't place where. I just realized you had asked a question about "the Big Three" and I responded (necessarily briefly; I was travelling in London and Switzerland at the time)...
I think the RO 15300 looks...
IMO, the AP Royal Oak design has aged very gracefully and has developed a strong following. The 15300 to me looks great and at approx 39mm is the perfect size and can be worn casually and formally. I like the thicker bracelet and the double deployant clas...
"I hated" Strong feeling ...
for something you spend (lots of) money, isn´t it? Why do you ask these questiones after you sold your watch? Are you unsure with your decision or what is it about? Just wondering. Oliver
Can't live life regretting decisions
No regrets sale funded the Patek purchase. I've only regretted one watch decision that was the Breitling Navitimer World. It was my first purchase and way tooo big. Never go over 40 mm again felt like I was wearing clock not a watch. Should have thought t...