chris4
579
Yep
Ivanclai....thats what I was trying to say the indicator should point at the relevant year number when half way through that year, so in this year 2011, come june/july the indicator should be smack on the number 3 and then slowly migrate towards the 4 in the second half of 2011, ending up smack on the number 4 in june 2012.
A better picture..
By: fernando : March 1st, 2011-04:24
here Brad, taken on the night. I think it is correctly positioned at the early part of the 3rd. year. Within a few mins. all the indicators were properly alighed (month,day etc.). Quite pleased with its performance. Best fernando This message has been edi...
Saved me a post!
By: chris4 : March 1st, 2011-04:51
I must admit that I set mine wrong!. I have a DP and had to look in the manual as to how to set it, and must admit, I now find the way the manual is written to be wrong or at the least ambiguous. It has a chart in the back showing that 2011 is year 3 in t...
Just to be clear then...
By: chris4 : March 1st, 2011-07:00
Yep I thought the same as rwk, should be midway between 3 and 4 as its approaching the 4th year in the cycle...and this is what I was led to believe from the manual. However it seems that as I have now adjusted mine, it should show currently between the 2...
Yep
By: chris4 : March 2nd, 2011-01:24
Ivanclai....thats what I was trying to say the indicator should point at the relevant year number when half way through that year, so in this year 2011, come june/july the indicator should be smack on the number 3 and then slowly migrate towards the 4 in ...