amanico
[JLC Moderator]
246288
Yes, but no. It is not interesting to do the same. Not in JLC spirit. [nt]
No message body
Lange & Sohne Double or Triple Split?
Double Split: Triple: I still have to post my review... Will do this month. Best, Nicolas ...
Well, the only one I did wear is the double split... [nt]
It was heavy, rain imposing but mesmerizing. I would say, currently still great value for money. Never seen the triple in the flesh... But I could live with the double 😉 Cheers, Dirk
Haven't Seen the Triple irl, but judging from Pictures and tech sheet....
I'd Go with the triple split. It's got the same diameter and is only .3 mm thicker than the double split, which is very little for a watch that's already above 15mm. The White gold case should make it less heavy than a Platinum one, which helps wearabilit...
Both are huge on the wrist but I like the dial more on the Triple Split as well as the technical marvel that it is 🔥🔥
Settling for a Double Split is not a bad thing in any case 😜
There is only one thing wrong with the double split
Triple split’s existence. I’ve long considered the double split my grail watch, but knowing that the triple split exists has dampened that feeling. From a value for money perspective, a DS can be had for less than half the money for a TS (if you can find ...
Triple is The Ultimate
please make a name for this (was it PP that name Rattrapante for double/catchup?)
