Interesting this "paper" wrist shot. That's far to be bad to give you a first impression

May 19, 2017,07:15 AM
 

Best wishes

Alkiro

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

A side by side comparison: 372 and 716

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 19th, 2017-01:30
Dear Gentlemen, As i haven't got the opportunity yet to put my hands on a Mare Nostrum , i decided to "virtually" compare it with a 372. I was worried about the 42mm, i thought it might be small. Actually it doesn't, mainly due to its long lugs. Now, I'm ...  

47 is actually too big for most.

 
 By: jomni1 : May 19th, 2017-02:08
44 is max that I can pull off. 42 will be comfy. But not "in your face Panerai".

The "paper" wrist shot

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 19th, 2017-02:20
Gorgeous, isnt it ! Size is perfect Best regards Fabio ...  

Printers these days getting better and better

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : May 19th, 2017-03:05
Looks good on you but if PAM I would pull 47

a true purist ;) HAGWE "Mr Green" [nt]

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 19th, 2017-04:26

It has convinced me too :) [nt]

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 19th, 2017-04:27

will look even more nice in real ;)

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 21st, 2017-23:37
Have a great week jomni1

If I may.....

 
 By: sergio : May 22nd, 2017-07:58
regardless of wrist sizes, of how well it does fit a wrist or another, a 42mm Panerai will always be a...small...Panerai, in my eyes The 42mm NM was, de facto, the first "compromise" Panerai made in the pursuit of....money

Of course you may...

 
 By: Horological_addict : May 22nd, 2017-12:29
Nobody is perfect And i guess they keep pursuing money by issuing this reedition... But it just looks so good !! Anyway, as you like to say, "whatever floats your boat", isn't it Best regards Fabio