jlc.thomsen
1709
Yeah it’s not bad at all, but...
I feel I’m optimising my collection. The Jules Audemars must have a disproportionate relation between case and movement, which I normally would call horological laysiness. But it has a solid case back ( I like that concept more and more especially on a gold watch) and you just can’t see on the dial that it has a small movement-at least I don’t really pick up the disproportion.
Photo credit AP
More posts:
Love that one, but it's got to go.
It’s really cool. Brand new and unworn ( well not really -I have been wearing it for a few minutes😂) Though I have to admit the jubilee isn’t the right bracelet for the GMT. Went into a part exchange yesterday. Bye bye Batman. ...
Jubilee + Bat=Batgirl
Fits the two not together. What did you get instead the Batgirl?
I didn’t even know it was called that.
If I knew that, I would have kept it. Oh my God she’s gorgeous! ...
Good for you...
I admire people that can make a decision when they know something isn’t right for them.🤨🧐🤔
Thanks Myles!
The whole purchase of this watch was a bit complicated. I never intended to wear it. But I kept it in the box until the right occasion came up. However if I felt love for the Batgirl I would have kept it though.
I does look good on the wrist but I too am curious on what you are taking instead...
Anything in particular you dislike about this one fit?
Yeah it’s not bad at all, but...
I feel I’m optimising my collection. The Jules Audemars must have a disproportionate relation between case and movement, which I normally would call horological laysiness. But it has a solid case back ( I like that concept more and more especially on a go...
Thanks Yako.
I hate to say it but a Watch Finder video I stumbled over by accident got me ignited on that one. Trying to sell one of theirs I think. Not sure when the video was made.
