quattro
[Moderator]
20056
Why not? But this name doesn’t mean a lot to me.
Based on my present knowledge. Things might change.
Best, Emmanuel
LörTscher - Patek Philippe in Brussels, Belgium
Yesterday, after finishing my post about the partnership between Patek Philippe and the Grogan Company of Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , I looked for other examples of the ref. 1401 on display at the Patek Philippe Museum , whose double-signed dial had pique...
Great looking, indeed.
Predictably, 491 for me. Were you aware of this Belgian watch dealer and of this collaboration? Best, Emmanuel
Don't think I was, quattro.
Always learning here. They've got a very distinctive signature. I quite like the co-signed pieces. They're not to everyones tastes, I know...
I like co-signed pieces when the name of the retailer makes me dream.
For whatever reasons, I like “Walser Wald”, “Serpico y Laino”, “Gobbi Milano” or even “Grogan Co.”, but am not enthralled by “Tiffany & Co.” or, I have to be honest, “LörTscher”... Best, Emmanuel
Why not? But this name doesn’t mean a lot to me.
Based on my present knowledge. Things might change. Best, Emmanuel
Great post again, had a good reading session
and learned a lot thanks to you. Love the 491 & 1401, these days I’m all for rectangular or tonneau cases.
Thanks a lot, Derreck.
Like you I find the 491 and 1401 very appealing. The 491, in particular. And the 1401 seems to be an absolute rarity: it would be great to find one someday... Best, Emmanuel