ndu
69
Two totally different design concepts
IMO the 5059 is a very classic (but not timeless) watch in terms of design. I agree that the retrograde adds an extra bonus but to my taste the 3940 is so much more versatile and timeless. I have been in that situation before (where I'm comparing two completely different watches as I like them both for different reasons) but I'd say that 5059 is more of a gamble as I can't see you'll ever grow tired of a 3940...
If you like the retrograde, why not go for a 5496P? I know it only comes in Pt but it is very elegant and at the same time more interesting than a 3940 given it's larger size/presence (3940 is simply too small for my wrists)... I know it's a watch which people often have mixed feelings about but I almost bought it and having tried it on several times I have to say it is a real beauty!
Anyway, GOOD LUCK and happy hunting!!!
What are people's thoughts of the5059 vs the 3940?
I have been looking at PP perpetuals recently and have become interested in bioth the 3940 and the 5059. The 5059 seems to be a very special watch that wears quite well on the wrist despite its thickness. In fact i think ithe thickness gives it a presence...
The unfortunate answer to this is...
... I think that it's a matter of sequence, not choice. HAHAHAHA! Let me explain: 1. First, it looks like you're a fan of the perpetual calendar complication - I understand that, as I'm a big fan as well. My first PP was the classic 3940P and as I am typi...
Truly, what's not to like with either.
However, there is some baggage with both that could be a nuisance later. The 3940 lacks a constant seconds hand and changing straps on the 5059 requires far more time and effort (to do it right without damaging the case and buckle screws) Personally, I pr...
Good point here
I do kind of miss the sweeping seconds hand in the 3940 but others feel that it gives it a more "Zen" vibe (much like how others prefer the 3700 versus the 5711/1A). 5059 is a great piece! I'd be fortunate to have one in my collection (maybe someday)...
why
are you selling the 950 Rolex DD? I have always wanted one of those. The weight must be awesome.
It's a bit of a dilemma honestly
Yes, the heft and sheen are great. In a perfect world I would keep it and just buy the PC. The reality is that to buy the PC something needs to be shed if I'm to do it at this time. The other issue is that the Rolex just no longer seems as special as it u...
Hi, these are entirely 2 different beats! and I would
like to own both of them, not either! I clarify that I prefer the 5050 over the 5059. I've achieved half of this mission, when's next to complete my quest? :) Mech.
Two totally different design concepts
IMO the 5059 is a very classic (but not timeless) watch in terms of design. I agree that the retrograde adds an extra bonus but to my taste the 3940 is so much more versatile and timeless. I have been in that situation before (where I'm comparing two comp...
I am of course biased.........
So naturally my choice is the 3940. The lack of a second hand does not concern me. Having recently seen a 5059P I found it to be too small when comparing diameter x height. Against the 3940, I would also be worried that i would catch it more, due to its h...
Very personal and tough choice.....But for me
I would prefer a 3940 and a 1st or 2nd series to be even more specific. As for the 5059 it is a fine watch but as I read in another post I would get a 5050P instead. A great collection could have one of each! Why stop there though add a 3970P with silver ...
I did my trade today.....winner was the 5059j
I just love the structure of the dial just won out for me. The watch feels like it can pull 2x duty as a watch with jeans or as a watch with a suit or tuxedo. The bulk makes it wear bigger than the stated 36mm. Thx for all your opinions.
Congrats daytonaman799! You got a great watch.
Will we call you from now on "patekperpetualman5059j"? Happy Eastern! Kari