@Patek_Ambassador
814
Owning the 5070 and 5327 vs. only the 5970
These are three superb references, the 5070 manual wind chronograph, the 5327 perpetual calendar, and then the reference that combines both complications into one spectacular piece, the 5970 perpetual calendar chronograph. Right now on the secondary, values of the 5970 ($120k) are almost exactly what one would pay in buying separately the 5070 and 5327 combined (about $60k each). Given this, it begs the question: For these pieces and complications, would you rather own one piece that combines them all (5970) or two pieces to keep these complications separate (5070 and 5327)?
Owning the 5070 and 5327 vs. only the 5970
These are three superb references, the 5070 manual wind chronograph, the 5327 perpetual calendar, and then the reference that combines both complications into one spectacular piece, the 5970 perpetual calendar chronograph. Right now on the secondary, valu...
Tough question.
I thought the exact sam thing 1 yrs ago. Well you know what I decided. ...
✅✅
I had 5070, I now have 5270 p I prefer the 5270, and the 5970 is a step above mine. Good luck with your choice.
My choice would be the 5970 or 5270
But I believe that the market prices are telling you the truth here, there is not a right or wrong answer, it's a matter of personal preference. To me, it depends on your current collection and what you're looking for with this addition.
Real tough one that.
I’d be unable to call it and have to do whatever to realise all 3. Sorry I know that doesn’t help. All are so different. I actually really love the 5327r and the 5070 but the 5970 is a must so a seriously difficult call. Good luck and I look forward to se...
Tough call...
All 3 are such nice watches and so very Patek. One way I'm thinking about this: If I owned all 3, I would probably wear the 5970 the most, followed by the 5070. Not sure how often I would wear the 5327, even if it's independently a very nice PC. So it wou...
