sham1
9768
I agree!
The G or the rarer P work better than the R due to the contrast of the black numerals and hands against the white metal. This is an excellent reference as I have mentioned to you previously and in my opinion terribly under rated and under valued being in gold with a hinged back and deployant clasp and costing less than half of a used 5712/A with an identical movement. It is also a rarer watch but unfortunately (or fortunately!) lower in demand relatively.
The 5054G is on my radar for quite sometimes. An underdog?
Personally I really like the dial and case design. At 36mm it wears perfectly on my wrist. Interesting enough for such dressy watch the G is actually working better than the R, IMHO. ...
I may be alone on this, but I really enjoy the asymmetry of the dial and functional set of complications.
As a collector, perhaps this isn't one of one, but a component of a broader set? I think it's very unique
Identical to 5712
In a different shell. Its like Aquanaut 5164 and the Pilot Calatrava 5524, sharing the same movement. When was this came out? Ian
I agree!
The G or the rarer P work better than the R due to the contrast of the black numerals and hands against the white metal. This is an excellent reference as I have mentioned to you previously and in my opinion terribly under rated and under valued being in ...
The analogy
People from different regions have different views on comparing dogs with watches, even still from western countries, might have a different background, thus a different feeling on this analogy. Chinese men eat dogs and would not object but others might. ...
Only down side
it needs a winding box. otherwise its fine. For a winding box, I want at least an annual calendar. But this watch is one of the best deals out and prices are starting to rise on it.
Great watch.
It was my first Patek , 5054J. I wore it daily for a decade. Incredibly accurate. Looks great in your wrist.