whit
558
Given the choice, I would select the 5070.
The fact is you are considering two modern watches, one of which was recently discontinued. The other factors, investment and rarity, you mentioned are questionable at this time, twenty or thirty years from now may more accurately measure those factors.
The responses you have gotten are personal preferences of one model vs. another and of the two, I prefer the 5070 cosmetically. But, I prefer the size and looks of the new chronograph over the 5070 and I'm sure five years from now there will be still one or more different models to consider.
The purchase dilemma of one vs. another will always exist and with new pieces being introduced more and more frequently in seemingly controlled quantities, it makes you either buy them all or wish you had selected the "right" one for your collection.
Thirty years ago, I don't believe Patek controlled the market as they seemingly do today. They were more than happy to build a 3450 for you, today appears to be another story altogether. Pieces are launched in one color maybe two for a period of time, then those are discontinued for a third color for a year or two, and finally a fourth color is launched creating a frenzy of, will this be offered in rose gold or platinum? Will my dealer be in a position to get one for me? I love the watch but would rather have leaf shape hands rather than pitched Dauphine hands, which if it isn't offered that way forget it, or hope and pray they will at some point. Those were not issues then, but certainly are factors today. How will they affect investment and/or rarity? It's a swag at best.
Available on the marketplace
2,889 Patek Philippe listings are live on the eBay market and 1722 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
5070g vs 5960p
By: Horology75 : August 18th, 2010-12:39
Both being at same price levels, which one one should consider buying for collection, retention of value, wearability and rarity. I love both of them but in terms of value the pt watch is a no brainer but investment and rarity the 5070 is the winner. But ...
very different watches IMO
By: roger1 : August 18th, 2010-13:32
Im fortunate enough to own both of these pieces and to be honest I feel that they look feel and wear too different to choose one over the other. The 5070 wears very wide and flat to the wrist while the 5960 wears smaller but has a heavier, thicker case, w...
It depends...
By: swjoseph : August 18th, 2010-14:44
on what you already have in your collection and what you'll be adding in the future. And more importantly, at what you look for in your Patek collection. I mean if you already own a 5980, 5070 add diversity, but 5960 completes your PP modern choron collec...
5960P
By: Highlander65 : August 19th, 2010-03:32
To me--the 5960P. I am biased as I own it. I went through the same process in buying it. It has a flyback and annual calendar vs. just a chrono and it is platinum. In fact to me the Lange Platinum Dato is a better watch to compare with the 5070 and it has...
Tough call...
By: masterspiece : August 19th, 2010-11:13
as both are very different but if I really had to choose, I would go with the 5070. The 5960 is PP's first in-house chrono which is a milestone for them. Don't really care for the "look" of the 5960 unless it is the 5960P. Love that blue sunburst dial. Ve...
Modern vs. Vintage.....
By: MiniCooper : August 19th, 2010-11:45
Two very similar watches but different at the same time..... 5960 is the modern face of PP while 5070 has a retro look... 5960 is the first in-house chrono for PP while 5070 is one of the last lemania movements (refinished of course and none left for futu...
Movement
By: Highlander65 : August 21st, 2010-08:17
While the 5070 is a beautiful piece--the 5960P movement(contrary to the last post) is quite nice and fits the case size perfectly. The 5070 movement on the other hand does not fit the case size and would have been much better suited in a 39 mm case vs 42m...