Comments:
... always love to hear such interesting observation found... sometimes it is really hard to explain why people made such variations, it is mistaken or purposely made... interesting indeed.
thanks for sharing, Blomman.
stefan
... why not... but it is really hard to find one lately as because it is too hot stuff among us!
stefan
<< Previous Comments
Talking about Polaris dials…
Here is a scan I found in a book recently:
To me it looks like a really bad repaint job.
I do hope that the plexi is a non original…
And the hands…
If you look at the centre crown it’s not a compressor crown – so replaced?
Anybody that is able to confirm my thoughts?
Compare with mine:
Best
Blomman
Not T - Swiss - T, the indexes, the hands, the plexy, the centre crown ...
It starts to make a lot...
Can you give us a look to the text, please?
Not really sexy.
Best,
Nicolas.
This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-05-17 20:09:59The author is referring the LeCoultre…
The author is referring the LeCoultre version as a little sister to the Jaeger-LeCoultre big sister (Polaris 68)!
After that I really loosed confidence in the book…
Best
Blomman
very interesting observation...
... always love to hear such interesting observation found... sometimes it is really hard to explain why people made such variations, it is mistaken or purposely made... interesting indeed.
thanks for sharing, Blomman.
stefan
Interesting indeed!
Thank you!
Maybe time for you to add a Polaris to your Memovox collection, Stefan?
Best
Blomman
add a Polaris?
... why not... but it is really hard to find one lately as because it is too hot stuff among us!
stefan