Got my Polaris yesterday and loved it until I turned off the light... or am I missing something?
It is from the new 2nd batch so it should be the "correct" dial. It just don´t look correct to me - at the moment...
Here it is - the 6, 9 and 12 has a lighter color than all the rest of the colored index but warmer than the white parts. The hands has also another color - more green and like the batch 1 hands (must be the same).
I think this is strange - white (no luminova), off white (w. luminova), light brown (no luminova) and green (w. luminova) on the same dial. I think batch 2 is a step back and I am a bit disappointed - I have allways felt highly about JLC but this it is so strange to me.
The rest of the watch is so well done and true to the original - with a non lumen index they could just as well have used glass instead of plexi, a stronger buckle and so.
Don´t get me wrong here - I have allways loved the Polaris and getting this grail is something special. But this is maby why I feel so bad over this small mistake.
Or am I beeing petty?

Just got some bad news…
My AD had a talk with JLC about my new Polaris with the missing luminova.
It is no mistake.
All future delivery of the Polaris 1968 w. the “correct” dial will be like mine=no luminova.
Apparently it is not possible to produce a balanced “vintage” colour with luminova…
I think it is strange that the colour of the index "wins" over the function of being visible at night. IT IS A DIVER!
I would rather have a off white index with luminova…
I think it is a strange decision and far from the concept of making a re-edition. All the rest about the Polaris is true to its origin – but now this?