my apologies to interrupt the conversation, is it traditional, more or less, British way of finishing? I prefer Swiss finishing, it is so visually pleasing, but appreciate British, subtle, approach.
Overall, they are not anathema to English watchmaking! Perhaps idiosyncratic in today's market.
By: gadalex : April 29th, 2026-14:54
Roger certainly aims for an even more obvious connection to past practitioners of this style of finishing (Breguet and Daniels being the obvious references). I think CF has perhaps administered a slightly more modern take with the zirconium oxide dial, pvd application of numerals and text and less traditional case shape. But ultimately, they share quite similar methodologies and techniques: think CNC, proprietary escapement, strong links to George Daniels, meticulous and elegant finishing focusing on function more than anything else. Again, just my take on it!
For me, they have a lot in common, but I just like the sharper or more angular bridges of RWS compared to CF.
By: quattro : April 30th, 2026-07:11
In the examples of CF movements you have shown above, I find the main bridge (3/4 bridge?) cutout around the balance wheel and Y bridge too rounded. Just an aesthetic personal preference. Best, Emmanuel