Comments:
For me the first.
The globe is beautiful but I love the more complicated dial of the first!
Both are magnificent mind you!
My measly 2 cents…
…I think Ed probably hit the nail on the head with his questioning the GMT. It probably looks the cooler watch to the civilian eye, but yours is not that and so I’m going to say the double too.
Dream watches. Really.
I hate the word but...
...the GMT is so iconic I would go for it. Congrats in advance, whatever your choice will be.
Both? 😂 GMT if you'll use the feature, DB otherwise?
Based on movement complication and architecture alone the DB is the winner for me. I think the DB makes sense as a sports watch movement for GF, it's a more durable option than the inclined / double tourbillons and the design of the constant force remontoir is underappreciated.
That said I've warmed to the GMT over time. I think the GMT makes better use of the volume of the big convexe case, the classic GMT watches have always been big boys to fit the globe in there anyway, and subjectively I think makes a better overall design. Additionally, production for the GMT so far has substantially less than the DB which comes in large, small, carbon, sapphire, purple etc. so I don't think there's a wrong choice here.
That said I've warmed to the GMT over time. I think the GMT makes better use of the volume of the big convexe case, the classic GMT watches have always been big boys to fit the globe in there anyway, and subjectively I think makes a better overall design. Additionally, production for the GMT so far has substantially less than the DB which comes in large, small, carbon, sapphire, purple etc. so I don't think there's a wrong choice here.