





I guess during assembly the notch will be opened a bit, bend a bit to put all into place and to hold it securely after wards.
There is nothing wrong with your lovely Up and Down ... a very nice 1815!
Best
Moritz


The whole thing is called swan neck regulator.
On the first pic you see the lever pointing to the left.
The little screw in the bottom will move the lever (called "Ruecker" in German) up if you crew in and down if you crew out.
This movement has also on impact on the notch: it will widen or close.
And this adjusts the length on the balance spring and hence it will swing faster if shorten or slowly if given more length.
Now you wonder why I did not tell this in the first post?
One easily forgets the basics, at times I confess with shame ...
Best
Moritz
This message has been edited by COUNT DE MONET on 2013-05-12 01:42:23 This message has been edited by COUNT DE MONET on 2013-05-12 02:13:08"This movement (of the lever) has also on impact on the notch: it will widen or close. And this adjusts the length on the balance spring and hence it will swing faster if shorten or slowly if given more length."
I don't see how this would affect the width of the notch all that much, if it all. Also, the notch shouldn't have anything to do with changing the length of the hairspring, as that is what the spoke/lever opposite the swan neck with the pins holding the hairsping is for. When the screw of the swan neck is adjusted it moves the regulator as a unit, and therefore the spoke/lever with the pins holding the hairspring will move also. This movement of the spoke/lever with the pins holding the hairspring captive is what changes the effective length. At least this is my understanding.
In your first post you said that the notch was a means of holding the regulator secure in position, like a friction fit you can tigthen or loosen to install/remove the regulator. That is, you can open the notch a bit wide to put everything in place, then narrow it to secure everything. But your second post seems to say that the notch actually changes shape when the swan neck screw is adjusted, and that this is what affects the length of the hairspring, which I do not agree with.
I hope I am not misinterpreting your words but that is how I understood your post.
Help? 
... I had to go into the text passage again to read about it.
The whole swinging system is made out of several pieces that have to be assembled together.
The notch in the regulator part will be like a spring as the component with the pins holding the balance spring has to fit into the regulator ring.
And as it has to stay in the regulator ring with a certain degree of friction, the notch will widen a bit when it is pushed in: hence it acts like a spring.
The notch is in any Lange movement, in any other movement in any other watch also that uses this way of adjusting the spring.
Nothing wrong there.
Moritz

Simply enter " Lange close up" into the Forum Search function here and tick "images" first.
You will see: it is all fine, all of them have got it.
I could see it even with my bare eyes in my 1815 homage moon phase!
One more interesting note: if you compare the close ups of Langes without in-house springs (like your model) with Langes with in-house ones (like mine)
you will see that Lange uses a different way to attach the balance spring.
The two brass pins are no longer in use anymore and the regulator is just "round", without the lever of the spring fixator.
This was used first in the Double Split, also the first watch to have used the in-house spring by the way.
PS
I hope you do no mind if I say "Dr Monet" a you claimed yourself to ne neurotic about watches.
Best
Moritz