Timecollector
24
How about neither one
I have seen better references of the Timewalker. But it does all come down to personal taste on individual models and unique differences Watch One I don't care for the seconds sub dial at 9 with the heavy gold border it has an unbalanced look about it. I have seen a similar reference is simple rose gold makers and it is very attractive. That one had a straight black band with no highlighted stitching
Watch twin is a nice reference but why add the gold pushers? I prefer the continued use of DLC on the pushers. Again, my taste my preference I am sure others would love these simple design changes as shown Regards Jay
#1
By: aaronm : April 20th, 2011-08:26
I don't ever like it when chronographs make the continuous second counter tiny, the way they did it on the second one. Hamilton has a habit of it and it always irks me. I'd rather they left it out and had a 6/12 bicompax design. A
#1 boring...yes I agree
By: mkt33 : April 23rd, 2011-06:02
I like the second version better because I like the larger hours counter. I seldom find myself timing anything less than half an hour... My chronos only get use as a parking timer! Now with Val Fleurier's involvement, I think the movements and overall des...
How about neither one
By: Timecollector : April 23rd, 2011-21:17
I have seen better references of the Timewalker. But it does all come down to personal taste on individual models and unique differences Watch One I don't care for the seconds sub dial at 9 with the heavy gold border it has an unbalanced look about it. I ...