MCG (Markus)
3593
Thanks for the nice and report!
All of them beautiful watches! However I prefer the CF with less blingbling Factor.
Though I would not be able to wear most of them - CF as well as BB - because they wear simply too big on my wrist.
I do hope that Hublot continues (or even expands) their 42mm range in the future... ;-)
I hear ya!
By: KIH : May 2nd, 2015-09:20
I love simple ones, too. And my wrist is small, too. But 45mm doesn't wear too big, mysteriously :-) Thank you, and let us search the best fitting CF! More to come, I am sure. Ken
Outstanding report, Ken.
By: MichaelC : May 2nd, 2015-07:41
I am intrigued by the new perpetual calendar, although legibility is not great for such a watch. I really think from the photos that the ceramic / magic gold watch is nicer looking than the full magic gold. And luckily, it is a regular edition :-) Appreci...
You know...
By: KIH : May 2nd, 2015-09:24
... we are all getting old, right? I find my eye sight getting a bit too old to use busy dial watches, hahaha. This is my problem before legibility :-) I am leaning toward simpler watches as I get old! Ken
Hublot Full Magic Gold
By: MTF : May 5th, 2015-04:04
Thanks Ken. The one I liked from Baselworld 2015 was not shown at Ginza boutique; sort of camouflage pattern case. From your selection in this post, I choose the Hublot Big Bang Full Magic Gold. The ultimate would be a Hublot Classic Fusion in full Magic ...