WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Glashütte Original

That's an interesting question, and one that's never . . .

 


. . . crossed my mind. One of the reasons I'm taken with Glashütte Original as a manufacturer is their modest and unpretentious corporate image - they do not seem to have a 'flagship' line or model. They will likely never create a grand complication. Most of their tourbillons are extensions of existing ranges that include relatively affordable models. There are tourbillons of limited production, but these are watches for a special sort of collector - the sort that cares little for prestige and peer approval, and appreciates fine watchmaking for it's own sake.

There have been many exquisite chronographs - PanoRetroGraph, Panograph, PanoMatic Chrono, Senator Rattrapante - but these, too, seem not to be the focus of many collectors; it seems that very few have more than one of any of the 'heavyweight' chronos. The exquisite cal 42 and cal 49 models have their fans - I count myself as one - but I can't say that any of them are icons. The laterally expansive Pano series is iconic, but likewise, I can't say that any of them are icons per se.

In my humble opinion, Glashütte's métier is the application of perpetual calendar complications to otherwise standard movements, and offering them at reasonable prices. It would be difficult to pick one as especially worthy, but if I had to choose one, it would be the limited edition steel Navigator perpetual:

glashutte.watchprosite.com

All in all, though, I don't think any model has the same iconic weight as the FF does for Blancpain, the Speedmaster for Omega, or the Submariner for Rolex. That, I believe, is a function of the quiet sensibility that seems to guide Glashütte Original . . . cordially, Art This message has been edited by Dr No on 2009-12-22 21:46:40

  login to reply
💰1849 Marketplace Listings for Rolex