in RG last year as that was the most conservative (if that term can be associated with MB&F to begin with) of the MB&Fs for me but I am really starting to take a serious liking to the HM3 as well not that I am liking my HM2 any less, in fact more ...
HM2 comes first HM3 second , and why ? well they just appeal to me in that order for my eye and taste, and i sure don't forget the technical part but i didn't come up with it cause both are on a high technical and innovative level. Faisal
from the case form and finishing and the movement. The 2 just doesn't talk to me, but niether does a plaque of chocolate. An exception is the 2 in saphire, the saphire reducing the wall of the massive slab to an interesting transparent, reflecting surface...
my familiarity with farout designs...and even MORE to come in 2010...will tell me that HM 1,2 and 3 are going to be reclassified by market forces as conservatively classic machine art pieces. Really. That said..for sculptural feel, and emotional reach int...
delivered? I thought about it, but at USD 15K, I would have have to be convinced that it will last for years without maintanance and keep time to my exacting standards.
For a watch it is great value. As a machine of measuring anything..it is expensive. The average reports on the Tread 1 have not been adequate or indeed fair to its importance. It is NOT an AK Geneve thing of interest, but a real life, important step for t...
Until I saw the "Frog" It was the HM3 "Standard" issue I also LOVE the HM2 - it really speaks to me. I think the FROG is just one of the best designs ever!