sham1
9622
Attention all experts! :-)
I have always been fascinated by the Ref 130 due its size, rarity and pure elegance as compared to more modern chronographs. Does anyone have any experience with this reference? Also, I am assuming the yellow gold version as illustrated is more common that the rose and white gold versions based on their current prices. As much as I am partial to rose and white gold, I would not be willing to pay double for a watch with the same movement but in a different metal. Being almost 80 years old, would the chronograph functions still be quite reliable? Should I be brave enough to acquire one, I would probably send it back to Patek for a service should I find it working less than satisfactory.
Thank you all in advance for your feedback.
Best wishes,
Sham
Attention all experts! :-)
By: sham1 : February 15th, 2017-04:31
I have always been fascinated by the Ref 130 due its size, rarity and pure elegance as compared to more modern chronographs. Does anyone have any experience with this reference? Also, I am assuming the yellow gold version as illustrated is more common tha...
I used to have one .
By: americano : February 15th, 2017-04:48
Hi sham .Really beautifull stylish watch, I had one 10 years ago and had it serviced by Patek , the replaced the movement completly cost me 5000 dollars at the time , and put in new buttons . Mine had base 1000 mile track. Chronographs are always very sen...
One small advice:
By: dr.kol : February 15th, 2017-06:00
Patek can service any watch to absolutely new-like condition. However, if the movement is somehow altered or non-Patek spare parts are used, they might refuse taking the watch for service. So agree with the seller that you will take the watch for a comple...
Thank you Kari!
By: sham1 : February 15th, 2017-06:15
Your advice is most useful and appreciated. Hopefully, it is all original. I tend to buy only new watches on the safe side but sometimes the allure of a watch as beautiful as the Ref 130 makes me re examine my priorities
Oh wow!
By: sham1 : February 15th, 2017-09:34
Congratulations to you Kari! Is that with the original certificate of origin and extract from the archives? How about a photo?! Knowing you, it must be something in steel or platinum!!
Many thanks Clint!
By: sham1 : February 15th, 2017-06:17
I think the watch wears larger than 33mm due to the thin surrounding bezel. To me it is near perfect apart from the fact the lovely complicated movement is hidden by the solid gold case back. Oh well, can't have everything I guess!
Mark, Thank you :-)
By: sham1 : February 15th, 2017-09:40
for the most invaluable advice. I had not taken into account air humidity which will be important as I shall be retiring to Malaysia in June. You are right - this is quite a project and one cannot be too careful. I always believe one gets what one pays fo...