
WHL's comprehensive review of the Vacheron Constantin Malte Small Seconds offers a deep dive into the collection's evolution, particularly its embrace of the tonneau case form. This article is invaluable for understanding the design philosophy and technical advancements that shaped the Malte line, providing historical context and detailed observations on a significant modern reference. WHL highlights how Vacheron Constantin refined its tonneau offerings, culminating in the 2012 Malte Small Seconds.



















The Vacheron Constantin Historiques American 1921 is a distinctive reinterpretation of a cushion-shaped watch originally produced by the manufacture for the American market in the 1920s. This reference is characterized by its unique diagonal display, with the crown positioned at the 1 o'clock position and the dial rotated 45 degrees clockwise. This design was historically intended to allow drivers to read the time without removing their hands from the steering wheel, offering both a functional and aesthetically unconventional presentation within the Historiques collection.
This particular iteration of the American 1921 features a case crafted from precious metal, often rose gold, with a polished finish that highlights its cushion shape and stepped bezel. The watch is typically fitted with a manual-winding mechanical movement, visible through a sapphire crystal case back, providing a power reserve suitable for daily wear. The crystal protecting the dial is also sapphire, ensuring clarity and scratch resistance.
The American 1921 appeals to collectors seeking pieces with historical provenance and an unconventional design. Its distinctive orientation and vintage inspiration make it a conversation piece and a unique offering within Vacheron Constantin's contemporary lineup. Various sizes have been produced, catering to different wrist preferences while maintaining the core design principles of the original 1921 model.
Then to see the same movement in the Patrimony, then in the American, then in this one is another argument which didn't please me. I know that Vacheron is far from being the only one to do so, but what I don't like here is something I don't like elsewhere. If I got it well, VC decided to opt for a solid case back? If, so, it is a good solution, but a round movement in a coffin shaped watch...Hmmm, I really don't like that. I much preferred the case of the first generation. Thanks for the write u
Hi Bill, I saw and tried this new Malte at the SIHH in January and appreciated the refined simplicity of this watch. Still I must also say that for me Vacheron Constantin means refined watches indeed, but with a stronger look. To some extent this one looks too simple for my taste. The original Malte Tourbillon remains, more than ten years later, the epitomy of modern design by Vacheron Constantin IMVHO. Clearly a dream watch. I don't say I would not wear this one, of course, but there are many o
"And we must keep in mind that historically Vacheron Constantin is not a calibre maker." Uhhh...what was going on before 1938? ;-)
Hi, We can quite probably say that at the time of the presence of Georges-Auguste Leschot at Vacheron & Constantin (1839-1882) Vacheron & Constantin made some fully in-house calibres (but who can say if that was all of their production). Then it's far less clear and in the Chronos dedicated to Vacheron Constantin you can read page 45: "Un accord intervint en septembre 1938.....Jaeger-LeCoultre continuerait a produire des ébauches pour Vacheron & Constantin a la vallée de Joux alors q
I share your interest in the history of Swiss watchmaking and particularly the "Maison Genevois"; an intricate collaboration of resources in the Genevan canton that worked as a symphony to produce, in the end, a watch! V&C has been in existence since 1755 and, up to the merger with Jaeger-LeCoultre (that's 183 years), produced the majority of it's own calibers. Yes, specialists have long existed for small-series complications, as they do today. LeCoultre supplied the vast majority of repeate
Bill, I really enjoyed this complementary piece to Alex's part 4. Great photos to dream over. If I could have only one it is the 30066 in the hong cong edition. The simplicity of time tourby without date and PR just sings or me, but the standard 30066 is fine too I like the size on wrist of the second evolution of the regulator. When I tried it on at the boutique I liked the larger presence versus the 30066 which I got to try the skeleton version in comparison. I find the tonneau shapes to be a
This thread is active on the Vacheron Constantin forum with 15 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →