
Fernando's original post, "Another day, another watch," showcases a striking Tudor chronograph, prompting an insightful discussion among collectors. This article delves into the nuances of modern Tudor chronographs, comparing them to vintage counterparts and exploring their technical advancements. Fernando's detailed observations provide a valuable foundation for understanding the evolution of Tudor's chronograph line.


How would you compare this to the โMonte Carloโ chrono released many years ago? I have not seen this in real life yet, but it looks symmetrical and balanced.
There are two main differences IMO: one is the case design, this one wears flatter and is also slightly thinner, so it doesn't feel as bulky as the MC. The other is the movement. This one uses the Breitling B01 with certain improvements and is integrated with a column wheel and a 70hr. PR. An all-around excellent movement IMO. The MC does not feel as comfortable on my wrist and is fitted with an ETA 2892 based modular movement. One thing that really irked me with that movement is the jumping min
It looks "rubberized" instead of all rubber... AP used to make those for the Offshores, but over time they would wear a bit quicker than others.
The specs are wonderful. I wish they produced a blackbay diving chrono with a rotating bezel.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →