Collection
Nicolas (amanico) initiates a compelling discussion comparing the allure of vintage Rolex GMT-Masters with their modern ceramic counterparts and the popular Tudor Black Bay GMT. His personal deliberation between these iconic GMT watches provides a unique lens through which to explore the evolution of a beloved complication. This article synthesizes community insights, offering diverse perspectives on collecting strategies and aesthetic preferences within the GMT watch segment.
As mentioned above - it would be a no brainer in the 58 case. Enjoy!
For me , the vintage GMT, it is more charming than the current version, as you noted. Second place is current Rolex GMT. I didnβt know watches can be brain eaters π
I couldn't bare the case profile of the BB GMT cheers
I waffled too over the Tudor but eventually took the plunge...with the cloth. Well worth it. Sometimes, after wearing one of the 58s for a few days, the larger gmt case seems absolutely justified. Depends on your wrist of course...
... it would be better if Tudor offered it in the 58 case size. You say you are deliberating about the Tudor vs. the newer ceramic Pepsi Rolex. I guess the main thing here is the price difference and availablility but ... though the Tudor is a great piece I feel the Rolex ceramic is the winner here. And the one your collection deserves so you will own the first (6542) and the last of the breed making company to the other vintage GMT you own. I always feel a deep deep pleasure when I view it on m
Thatβs a marvelous Rolex GMT!! Thenβ¦ the Tudor could be an excellent choice in the meantime! ππ Abrazos amigo mio!!
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 31 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
