Rolex Yacht-Master II Stainless Steel
Discussion

Rolex Yacht-Master II Stainless Steel

By amanico · Oct 24, 2014 · 23 replies
amanico
WPS member · Rolex forum
23 replies7325 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

When the Yacht Master II was unveiled, several years ago, I was skeptical, for aesthetical reasons, mostly. More than skeptical, to be honest, I just didn't like it. Since... Since I saw the stainless steel version. First in pictures, then in the real. And I had a lot of time, between two planes, in

23 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
When the Yacht Master II was unveiled, several years ago, I was skeptical, for aesthetical reasons, mostly.

More than skeptical, to be honest, I just didn't like it.

Since... Since I saw the stainless steel version. First in pictures, then in the real. And I had a lot of time, between two planes, in several airports, to test it.


The blue ceramic bezel, the dial, the original complication ( 10 minutes retrograde chronograph, for regattas ), all these détails made me reconsider the Watch.

I am not still in the mood to buy it, but I must confess that I changed my mind.

I find it cool and original. Big, certainly, with its 44 mm ( ! ) case, but far from being unwearable, once on the wrist, at the point that I had to check the size more than once!

The Yacht Master is the most Un Rolex among Rolex watches, and the " II " doesn't escape to that observation. Maybe it is why I love the Yacht Master so much?

Funny how a version can lead you to reconsider your point of view on a reference.

What is your opinion on this one?

Best,

Nicolas.
Advertisement
The Discussion
RN
rnaden
Oct 25, 2014

I've bee able to see it in the metal, and like you, I didn't like it at first sight. I thought the color combinations were too loud, and I just didn't like the size. Strange when you think that the YM is my favorite Rolex, but then again, this is a very different beast. I still don't like it, with the size, the polished center links and the color of the dial which I also find too noisy. Maybe if I had the opportunity to test this beyond the few minutes at the AD I might be more convinced... As a

AM
amanico
Oct 25, 2014

and to buy it, as I have many other priorities, but my perception of the Watch is more positive, now.... Yes, you made me think about it, but I never saw someone wearing it! Best, and thanks for your input, Richard. Nicolas

HS
hs111
Oct 25, 2014

.. something, I would like to try on; also the dial too noisy & somehow unbalanced. - On the other hand, I agree, that although a bit " Un-Rolex", it provides a tint of originality ( retrograde Chrono) and freshness. - Finally, its size with 44 mm usually for my wrist is way too big, that that would have to be seen in the real, to be "objectively" assessed. Lastly, if I think it over, where in todays world of elektronic timing in boat racing,or regattas, dies it fit ? Does it have it's place of

KC
KC74
Oct 25, 2014

..actually use it. But for practical reason, not for me. If I have the choice, I will go for the Sky Dweller, not sure if available in stainless steel version or not, now. I did not like it when it was released but now, it's a different story. You are right, certain things make u reconsider.

AM
amanico
Oct 25, 2014

That I didn't change my mind, yet, on the Sky Dweller. Try this one, on, you may be surprised. Not about the functionality, except if you are a sailor, but about the coolness... Surprising.. Best, my friend. Nicolas

AM
amanico
Oct 25, 2014

It is all about coolness ( a sentiment you are very familiar with...;) ) versus functionality ( regattas apart )... Not for everybody, but it is far from being a " vanilia Watch ". :) All the best, my friend. Nicolas

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →