26 replies3334 views1 photos
Mary Anny's post, "Should I pop it?!", invites readers into the enduring appeal of vintage Rolex references. Her captivating photography highlights the distinct aesthetic qualities that continue to draw collectors to older models. This article explores the nuanced discussion around the charm and technical performance of classic Rolex watches compared to their modern counterparts.
Have a marvellous Wednesday dear people!
Here's holiday!
Key Points from the Discussion
- The lug bevels and domed plexiglass of vintage Rolex models are key aesthetic features that distinguish them from modern ceramic versions, which, despite technical improvements, often lack the same charm for some collectors.
- Mary Anny clarifies that the featured watch is a Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513 with a service dial from 1989, sharing additional images including a comparison with a damaged modern Rolex.
- From a technical standpoint, a well-maintained Rolex Ref. 5513 can perform as smoothly as a new Submariner, suggesting that technical improvements in modern models (beyond bracelet clasp and water resistance) are not always a compelling reason to prefer them over a charming vintage piece.
- Another collector shares a wristshot of their own Rolex, contributing to the visual appreciation of the brand's timepieces.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
