Rolex Vintage Patina: Collector's Guide
Vintage

Rolex Vintage Patina: Collector's Guide

By Chromatic Fugue · Jan 26, 2024 · 24 replies
Chromatic Fugue
WPS member · Rolex forum
24 replies7570 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Chromatic Fugue's inquiry into the patina differential on a late 1980s Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513 highlights a critical consideration for vintage watch collectors: the originality and matching condition of tritium hands and dial markers. This discussion delves into how such discrepancies impact a watch's collectability and value, offering essential insights for anyone navigating the nuanced world of vintage Rolex acquisitions. The community's collective wisdom provides a valuable framework for assessing authenticity and making informed purchasing decisions.

24 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Hoping to tap into the collective watch wisdom here. I’m considering the late 1980s 5513 pictured here. As you can see, there’s more patina on the markers than the hands. I’m told that the lume on the hands is in fact tritium. A couple of questions. First, does the patina differential between the hands and markers suggest that the hands were replaced at some point, or is that common even in examples where the hands are original? Second, does this patina difference matter much from a collectability perspective? Many thanks for your thoughts.





About the Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513

The Rolex Submariner reference 5513 is a specific iteration within the Submariner model line. This reference is recognized by collectors for its particular configuration and production period.

The case and movement details for this specific reference are not provided in the input facts. Therefore, no description of the case material, crystal type, or movement architecture can be offered.

This reference appeals to collectors interested in the Submariner line. Its position within the broader Rolex catalog is defined by its reference number and the characteristics associated with that specific production.

Specifications

Caliber
Rolex Caliber 1520 / 1530
Case
Stainless Steel
Diameter
40mm
Dial
Black (Gilt or Matte)
Water Resist.
200m
Crystal
Acrylic

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
BI
Bill
Jan 26, 2024
It does appear that the hands may have been changed during service.

The texture is hard to appreciate on the hands with these pictures. If you have a black light you can test to see how they glow. If they are all of the same temperature and luminosity it could just be nature. Nice looking watch.

MA
Mary Anny
Jan 26, 2024
Exactly!

The difference in colour is between the tritium (markers) and the lumknova (hands) lume. I'll send you a photo later...

CH
Chromatic Fugue
Jan 26, 2024
Thanks but

To be clear, I have it on good authority that the hands are tritium and NOT luminova. So if the hands were replaced, it was with other tritium hands.

MA
Mary Anny
Jan 26, 2024
It can be,

But then, they were not replaced. Below you can see what used to happen to the hands lume from the eighties. I would follow Bill's advice, let's check the luminosity!

BI
BigFatPauli
Jan 26, 2024
So if you have it "on good authority" why ask?

What Mary Anny is true: get a black light and check for yourself. No one here needs to convince you of anything.

CH
Chromatic Fugue
Jan 26, 2024
Here’s why I’m asking.

The seller — who I trust completely — has confirmed the hands are tritium (he used the black light test). So that’s not the question. Instead, my questions are these. - First, given that everything is tritium, how likely is it that these are replacement hands? I will ask the seller to send me black light photos, as Bill suggests, but my guess is that black light will reveal differences between the hands and the markers, even if not as much as visible light does. Thus, to judge whether the hands

Available on the marketplace

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →