Rolex Vintage Market Shift: Modern vs. Classic Demand
Vintage

Rolex Vintage Market Shift: Modern vs. Classic Demand

By techniec · Mar 16, 2026 · 25 replies
techniec
WPS member · Rolex forum
25 replies1884 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Pieter, known as 'techniec' on WatchProSite, initiates a compelling discussion on a common horological journey: the shift from modern to vintage Rolex. His personal reflection, prompted by a milestone birthday, invites fellow collectors to explore the nuanced appeal of vintage pieces, contrasting their unique character and historical patina with the technical superiority of contemporary references. This article synthesizes community insights into the enduring charm and complexities of collecting vintage Rolex.

Dear fellow WIS,

With reference to the topic matter, please may I draw your attention to the following.

As of recently, my taste in watches seems to be shifting from modern to vintage and neovintage, especially when it comes to Rolex. It might have something to do with the fact that I recently turned 50 and am becoming a bit of a relic myself smile Mind you, I am not knocking modern Rolex at all and recognise that their current watches are vastly superior to their vintage predecessors from a technical perspective, however there is something magical about the fact that these vintage pieces are all more or less "one-offs" with patina on the dial and indices and sometimes unique bezels reflecting the journey of the watch before you acquired it. I also like the fact that with vintage, you really have to do your homework to become in the know and to avoid buying a Frankenwatch, and that it's much less about who has the biggest wallet or the right AD connections to score a (often hyped up) reference which many others own too.

To illustrate I attach pictures of both my vintage Sub 1680 and my modern Sub 126619LB (Cookie Monster). The Cookie Monster is very well put together and the heft on the wrist certainly feels nice, but the 1680 just has a certain charm to it that is hard to resist, and is more and more becoming my daily driver. Same with my 16700, albeit to a lesser extent. Many years ago, I also owned a 1655 Steve McQueen (with straight second hands) which I stupidly sold off as I just didn't "get it" at the time and hated the rattly bracelet. Would love to own one again.

Did you experience a similar transition ? Really keen to hear your stories !

Thanks and best regards,


Pieter





Watch by Rolex, 1680, Submariner Date

About the Rolex Rolex Submariner Date Ref. 1680

The Rolex Submariner reference 1680 is notable as the first Submariner model to feature a date complication, marking a significant evolution for the line. Introduced in the late 1960s, it bridged the gap between the earlier no-date Submariners and later iterations, offering enhanced functionality while retaining the robust characteristics of the professional tool watch. This reference is distinguished by its single cyclops date magnifier on the crystal, a feature that would become a hallmark of many subsequent Rolex models.

This reference typically features a 40mm steel case, housing the self-winding Caliber 1575 movement. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The crystal is acrylic, commonly referred to as Plexiglas, contributing to its vintage aesthetic. Water resistance for the 1680 is rated at 200 meters, consistent with its design as a reliable underwater instrument.

For collectors, the reference 1680 is highly sought after, particularly early examples with "Red Submariner" dials where the word "Submariner" is printed in red. These variants represent a distinct period in Rolex's production history and are prized for their rarity and aesthetic appeal. The 1680 appeals to those who appreciate the blend of historical significance, functional design, and the tangible qualities of vintage Rolex manufacturing.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.1575
Case
steel
Diameter
40mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
200m
Crystal
Acrylic (Plexiglas)

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
CA
cazalea
Mar 16, 2026

Thanks for the interesting lead-in post. I've had a few Rolexes along the path of my watch journey. Here is my favorite, and currently my only Rolex. The seller's pictures,, from June 2005. These images intrigued me, as they seemed unlike a "normal" Rolex. The slang term for this model was "gas meter dial". I've had at least a half-dozen Rolexes of various sorts, most of which seem to have found new homes. Either I "converted" them into another watch, or sold them due to lack of interest or read

BL
Blansky
Mar 16, 2026

I bought it used in around 2008. As for vintage, I don't do patina, and the fact that it's almost impossible to tell if a watch has been "Franked" I'd be afraid to buy one. That being said I do love some of the vintage designs. I guess I wish that Rolex would reissue some of them, which I seriously doubt they ever will. So I'm perfectly happy to stick with this one, non maxi dial, no cyclops etc and let others play the Rolex AD game. Also what I'm finding, since there are about 10 watches I boug

ZS
ZSHSZ
Mar 16, 2026

I had a couple of five digit references, but the clasp and bracelet always subconsciously bothered me, with total understanding that “at the time”, it was top quality. Once they change to the new clasps and tank like bracelets I never looked back. I loooove vintage, but on others wrists, let alone that most are “Franken”, unless you started very early or you have goo-goo dollars… I don’t play AD games either, I express interest if it happens good, if not even better for my wallet )) But to be ho

RO
roundel
Mar 16, 2026

I sold of my first Rolex, 14060, because of the folded end links. I’ve sold off Sinn EZM1s for the same fault. After a decade and a half of writing off Rolex, I tried again with a SeaDweller 43, and I’m content with the vault nature of current Rolex build quality.

GR
gregcarraram3
Mar 16, 2026

over the last 25 years. I am down to a 5513 right now. It has the eagle beak crown guards, but, matte dial, likely replaced long ago as supposedly they were issued in the early 60s with gilt dials…my jeweler is very, very knowledgeable about all things Rolex. My dial could be original, he said Rolex did some weird stuff back in the day and sometimes there were a few that don’t match up with what all the experts say. No one knows but Rolex. I don’t doubt that it is all genuine Rolex parts. I have

OY
oyster case
Mar 16, 2026

Certainly the bracelet and clasp are huge improvements on the 126610 and the ceramic bezel is quite alluring to my eye. The 16610 wears well as it’s a bit lighter and being only 20 years old and was originally bought new by my next door neighbour it’s completely original and has never been polished at all. I bought from him only one year after he bought it. Older pieces than that are intriguing but a minefield which I haven’t been tempted to navigate. I own a 1960 OP which is all original but I

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 25 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →