Vintage
Amanico's post showcases a stunning Rolex Submariner 6536/1, drawing attention to its distinctive orange accents and 'lollipop' second hand. This piece sparks a lively debate among collectors about the authenticity of specific vintage details, underscoring the complexities and passionate discussions inherent in collecting rare Rolex references. It's a testament to the enduring allure and intricate history of vintage Submariners.
The Rolex Submariner reference 5508 represents the No Date series within the Submariner model range. Produced from 1958 to 1962, this reference is distinguished by its black dial that has developed spider patina over time.
The 5508 features a 37mm stainless steel case fitted with an acrylic crystal and rotating bezel. Water resistance is rated to 200 meters. The automatic Cal. 1530 movement provides 42-48 hours of power reserve. The watch is paired with a steel bracelet.
This reference appeals to collectors focused on vintage Submariner variants from the late 1950s and early 1960s production period. The spider patina dial condition represents a specific aging characteristic that develops over decades. Within the No Date Submariner lineup, the 5508 occupies the position of a four-year production run reference with the Cal. 1530 movement.
The 6536/1 is a very underated watch, I feel! Usually the gilt printing is a wonderful dark copper, and there are many interesting details like white lollipop seconds hand and red triangle inlay. Even though I really like my 5508, if offers less to look at! Only the 1530 movement is by far easier to service if you need spare parts! The Sub you show is especially nice!
Add to your 5508 yes... that sounds good. The white hand is a nice touch. It is very true how the gilt cam be on the bronze side and on the golden side. You can really see the bronze gold on the right.
The orange/ copper tone of the writings, is awesome ! .. Yet, to start with, maybe something like your wonderful 5508, would be a nice begin !.. Best, hs ;)
The large lollipop hand is incorrect. I have been doing research on this. It should be be a smaller hand like the one on Eric Ku collection (see hodinkee). I question even if the lollipop white hand is at all correct (small or large) as the 6536-1 is an early reference. The first ones are from 1957 and it might be that they still carried gilt hands like the earlier hands of the 6205 or 6204 still. Perhaps someone knows when the white hands took over. I know it must have been towards the end 1950
Just never got much wrist time. Bill
... collection! You call my greedy apetite with your pictures! Should I change my avatar back to Dexter´s? Lol! Un abrazo mi amigo! Abel.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
