
Baron - Mr Red offers a detailed look at the Rolex Submariner Ref. 5508, a 'small crown' model often overshadowed by its 'Big Crown' counterparts. This article delves into the unique characteristics and historical context that make the 5508 a compelling vintage reference for collectors. He highlights its short production run and the distinctive glossy dials that define its era.



The Rolex Submariner reference 5513 is a notable example within the Submariner line, distinguished by its two-line dial and lack of a date complication. Produced for an extended period, it represents a core offering for collectors seeking a straightforward and robust tool watch. Its design emphasizes legibility and functionality, aligning with the original purpose of the Submariner series. This reference is recognized for its consistent aesthetic throughout its production run, with subtle variations in dial text and bezel inserts.
The watch features a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case, offering durability and water resistance suitable for its intended use. Powering the reference 5513 is the automatic Caliber 1520 movement, known for its reliability. The crystal is acrylic, contributing to the vintage character of the watch. The unidirectional rotating bezel, typically with an aluminum insert, allows for elapsed time measurement.
For collectors, the reference 5513 is a significant model due to its long production history and the various dial iterations, such as gilt and matte dials, which present distinct collecting opportunities. Its appeal lies in its foundational design and its position as a non-date Submariner, making it a desirable piece for those who appreciate the model's original form. The watch is often paired with an Oyster bracelet, completing its functional aesthetic.
I have also made my part today: I bought a (too expensive) vintage Rolex Submariner that I expect to get on Thursday. In fact I expect to get two Submariners on Thursday. You guys with your posts and nice photos drive me nuts! Best, Kari
.......it is all pleasure from her onwards!
It is a fact that the 5508 is not winning the comparison with the 5512 / 13, at least for the last years... And I never got why the Small Crowns are less appreciated than the 5512 / 13. Since my interest for your article. I totally agree with you that the Small Crowns are perceived as a kind of Boxter, and that the Big Crowns are the 911.... Even though it is hard to be sure that the small crown was not born before the big crown... In that case, it may be the 911. ;) If we compare the prodcution
.......my answer to your question is that I am not sure. Certainly, a number of reference books suggest 1961......however, i have seen so many cases with serial numbers that suggest 1962 and even 1963....... ....of course, it is plausible that actual production finished yet the watches remained on sale for many years. 1961 according to many reference books....1962/3 according to serial numbers. Where is the Italian when you need him?
For me, I have lovely versions of both, but I would go 5512. But I am especially attached to my 5512!
Joe- first I enjoyed your post on the small crown 5508 very much. Not much is known about this reference. Your example is growing on me (indeed any 5508) as I much prefer the earlier small crowns namely the 6536-1 which have a much more 'gilt' dial and hands. Also a big congratulations on a small point BUT very important one. Your correct plus sign on the crown is a marvel. Very rare and correct- most are with the incorrect crown. The devil is in the details and you got the details here right. O
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 56 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →