
Subexplorer's post offers a compelling comparison between his modern Rolex Ceramic Submariner (Ref. 116610) and his cherished vintage Submariners. His detailed observations on size, weight, and aesthetic differences provide invaluable insights for collectors weighing the merits of contemporary versus classic Rolex dive watches. This discussion is particularly relevant for those who appreciate the evolution of an iconic reference while holding a soft spot for heritage pieces.







The Rolex Submariner reference 5513 is a notable example within the Submariner line, distinguished by its two-line dial and lack of a date complication. Produced for an extended period, it represents a core offering for collectors seeking a straightforward and robust tool watch. Its design emphasizes legibility and functionality, aligning with the original purpose of the Submariner series. This reference is recognized for its consistent aesthetic throughout its production run, with subtle variations in dial text and bezel inserts.
The watch features a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case, offering durability and water resistance suitable for its intended use. Powering the reference 5513 is the automatic Caliber 1520 movement, known for its reliability. The crystal is acrylic, contributing to the vintage character of the watch. The unidirectional rotating bezel, typically with an aluminum insert, allows for elapsed time measurement.
For collectors, the reference 5513 is a significant model due to its long production history and the various dial iterations, such as gilt and matte dials, which present distinct collecting opportunities. Its appeal lies in its foundational design and its position as a non-date Submariner, making it a desirable piece for those who appreciate the model's original form. The watch is often paired with an Oyster bracelet, completing its functional aesthetic.
... deserve some wrist scans too! Here they are: 1680 Red, and 16613TT. I find the color of this dial, the most amazing blue of any watch ever. I bought this watch brand new, when I learned it was discontinued and replaced by the new ceramic blue version, which I personally do not like as much as this one. Of course, it is only a very subjective and personal view, but I love this deep cobalt blue color so much! This picture was taken just after taking the new watch from its box, so the transpare
Why do you make these temptations. So much to love about this one and all the modern conveniences and a very nice dive companion. I just had my Omega 600 Ploprof certified for 200 meters which is good for a vintage but you always run risks. I am jealous. best Bill
All your Subs are beautiful but the Red 1680 is something else.
With the Vintage Submariner, in terms of feelings, at least. This green version is quite cool, though. But you need to get some tan before wearing it nicely. I never had the possibility to touch one... I will. Thanks for the article, my friend. Very interesting to read. Best, Nicolas
... and yes, I´ve been using my old 1977 1680 Sub for scuba diving till a few years ago, but I decided it is not necessary to risk it anymore. Glad to know about your Omega being certified, but I personally wouldn´t risk it if it were mine, though I understand that retiring them from these activities means less enjoyment of these beautiful instruments. Thank you for your kind comments! Very cordially, Abel.
... the green dial and bezel looks much better with a tanned skin. Regretably I can´t scape from office for some needed vacations near the sea during this hot summer down here. I also agree that it is unfair to compare the new model with its vintage cousins in their feeling and charm. Sometimes I feel it is the same than comparing a present made Ford Mustang with the 1966 predecesor or the new Jaguar Type F with a 1960´s Type E. The old cars have the charm, the romance, the classic lines, the no
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →