
Subexplorer's post offers a compelling comparison between his modern Rolex Ceramic Submariner (Ref. 116610) and his cherished vintage Submariners. His detailed observations on size, weight, and aesthetic differences provide invaluable insights for collectors weighing the merits of contemporary versus classic Rolex dive watches. This discussion is particularly relevant for those who appreciate the evolution of an iconic reference while holding a soft spot for heritage pieces.







The Rolex Submariner reference 1680 is notable as the first Submariner model to feature a date complication, marking a significant evolution for the line. Introduced in the late 1960s, it bridged the gap between the earlier no-date Submariners and later iterations, offering enhanced functionality while retaining the robust characteristics of the professional tool watch. This reference is distinguished by its single cyclops date magnifier on the crystal, a feature that would become a hallmark of many subsequent Rolex models.
This reference typically features a 40mm steel case, housing the self-winding Caliber 1575 movement. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The crystal is acrylic, commonly referred to as Plexiglas, contributing to its vintage aesthetic. Water resistance for the 1680 is rated at 200 meters, consistent with its design as a reliable underwater instrument.
For collectors, the reference 1680 is highly sought after, particularly early examples with "Red Submariner" dials where the word "Submariner" is printed in red. These variants represent a distinct period in Rolex's production history and are prized for their rarity and aesthetic appeal. The 1680 appeals to those who appreciate the blend of historical significance, functional design, and the tangible qualities of vintage Rolex manufacturing.
... deserve some wrist scans too! Here they are: 1680 Red, and 16613TT. I find the color of this dial, the most amazing blue of any watch ever. I bought this watch brand new, when I learned it was discontinued and replaced by the new ceramic blue version, which I personally do not like as much as this one. Of course, it is only a very subjective and personal view, but I love this deep cobalt blue color so much! This picture was taken just after taking the new watch from its box, so the transpare
Thank you so much for such a complete and interesting post. It is very useful to me, and at the same time a guide to learn about modern Subs. I am so focused on vintage that I still could not get involved in detail with the new models. I never had in my hands the green ceramic one but it looks stunning in your, as usual, great photographs! Un gran abrazo!
,,, my view somehow! Glad you like it and I´m happy my post can give you some insight about new versions of an old classic. It sure deserves your attention! Will keep in touch my friend! Un abrazo. Kind regards, Abel.
Why do you make these temptations. So much to love about this one and all the modern conveniences and a very nice dive companion. I just had my Omega 600 Ploprof certified for 200 meters which is good for a vintage but you always run risks. I am jealous. best Bill
... and yes, I´ve been using my old 1977 1680 Sub for scuba diving till a few years ago, but I decided it is not necessary to risk it anymore. Glad to know about your Omega being certified, but I personally wouldn´t risk it if it were mine, though I understand that retiring them from these activities means less enjoyment of these beautiful instruments. Thank you for your kind comments! Very cordially, Abel.
All your Subs are beautiful but the Red 1680 is something else.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →