
Miranda draws a compelling analogy between the Rolex Sea-Dweller and the Porsche 911, exploring their parallel evolutions and the concept of a '996 moment' where a beloved design undergoes a significant, potentially divisive, transformation. The author questions whether the discontinued SD4000 (116600) will truly escalate in value as predicted, using the air-cooled 911 as a benchmark for collector desirability.
















The Porsche Design Chronograph I, reference 911, represents a significant early offering from the brand, establishing its design philosophy in the watchmaking world. This model is notable for its minimalist aesthetic and functional approach, reflecting the brand's automotive heritage through its focus on legibility and material choice. It was conceived as a tool watch, prioritizing clarity and durability over ornate decoration, a characteristic that set it apart from many contemporaries upon its introduction.
Crafted with a black PVD-coated stainless steel case, the Chronograph I features a distinctive monochromatic appearance. The case diameter measures 40mm, providing a substantial yet wearable presence on the wrist. It houses an automatic movement, specifically the Valjoux 7750, known for its robustness and reliability. The watch is fitted with a sapphire crystal, ensuring scratch resistance, and offers a power reserve of approximately 48 hours.
This reference holds particular appeal for collectors interested in the origins of Porsche Design's horological ventures and the broader trend of black-cased watches. Its straightforward design and mechanical integrity make it a compelling choice for those who appreciate a blend of automotive-inspired engineering and practical watchmaking. The 911 reference is a foundational piece, illustrating the brand's initial vision for a performance-oriented timepiece.
It seems to be a very interesting subject at the moment. Although I like the new one, especially the size, it just isn't enough to fit in the collection and the previous 4000 is too similar to my sub to fit in the collection..!! Yours, Andy.
Owning the 964 Jubilé and having owned the 16600, I see the similarities. I have a weak spot for the 116600, but there are three things that are big bummers/flaws: 1. Rolex-marked rehaut, which is a deal breaker for me 2. shiny ceramic bezel, which makes the watch a bling item 3. the fact that the bracelet sits higher than the case\'s lugs, which is something beyond me, why would they design something as flawed by default Hence, the 16600 is the clear winner for me too. All the best and thanks f
I fully agree on your assessment! Best Blomman
I like the way you compare the 911 and the SD. Maybe you could also say that like the 911, the new SD is bigger. Did it loose its spirit? I don't know. Somehow, yes, with this cyclop. I am not thrilled by the last opus, but I have to see it in the real before any final judgement. Let's say that, for me, the last desirable SD is the 16660. As for the Porsche, I am a big fan of the 964. Like the Daytona 16520, it is a bit a " best of both words ". Best, my friend. Nicolas
Owning a 1665 DR and a 16600 as well as a '68 911S and a 964RS, I can fully relate to your analogy. To me, however, the 996 of Seadwellers was the 116600, for similar reasons like those given by Alex: the bracelet endlinks that do not match the case horns but also the lifeless semi-matte dial. Actually I much prefer the new SD and have ordered one already. I just hope it is not too big for my wrist as I am very much used to 40mm Rolex.
SD4000 is a lovely watch. But it\'s no icon.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 12 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →