
Tim_s shares his journey to acquiring his first Rolex, a Sea-Dweller Ref. 16660, after a year-long search. His post details the decision-making process between the Ref. 1665 and the Ref. 16660, highlighting the appeal of vintage elements combined with modern robustness.
I decided over a year ago that one of my next watches was to be a Rolex. I have a large wrist and knew that the Sea-Dweller was the model for me. I liked the history and also how it goes under the radar amongst non-watch people.
I knew, soon after I started looking that it was going to be a matte dial as I fell in love with the yellow/brown patina that develops over time. I tried on a "Great White" 1665 last year as I figured this was the best place to start looking. The original reference SD, the one with the most history, the domed acrylic which i so love on some of my other vintage watches. Unfortunately, i didnt fall in love. It felt quite light due to the bracelet and almost a little fragile - comparable to some of my other vintage watches but not the characteristic I was looking for with this watch. It just didnt feel very rugged...
This was purely first impressions and I dont doubt that the 1665 is a tough watch but these impressions wouldnt leave my head. This is when I started to look at the 666. The beefier case, the saphire crystal (shame its not acrylic but still more practical), the solid end link bracelet and the early ones still with the matte dial. These more modern elements started to win me over and a matte dial 666 felt like a perfect compromise, the best of both worlds?
When I found one late last year with an unusual patina (not to mention matching on the dial, hands and also insert) in good shape with all the original parts including a non/very lightly polished case, the open 6's/9's date wheel and the original bracelet with no stretch it seemed too good to be true...the icing on the cake was that this watch was the same age as me. This was the one!
First impressions are even better. My photos do a very poor job of showing the colours and condition. I couldnt be happier with it, I think I am now officially a Rolex fan. I am a bit worried...I keep reading GMT posts lately (there have been loads!!) and I feel this bug slowly biting me...I enjoyed looking for my Sea-Dweller so hopefully have the same fun with a GMT some day...
Here are some pics of my new 16660, I found wrist shots really difficult, maybe due to the AR coating so tips would be appreciated!! I hope you enjoy:









The Rolex Sea-Dweller reference 1665 is a significant model within the brand's professional tool watch lineage, distinguished by its enhanced water resistance compared to contemporary Submariner models. This reference was developed to meet the demands of professional saturation divers, featuring a helium escape valve (HEV) integrated into the case side, a key differentiator from other Rolex dive watches of its era. It represents a period of innovation in deep-sea horology, offering a robust solution for extreme underwater environments.
This reference features a 40 mm stainless steel case, designed for durability and resistance to high pressures. It is powered by the automatic Caliber 1575, a chronometer-certified movement known for its reliability and precision, offering a power reserve of approximately 42 to 48 hours. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal, contributing to its water resistance rating of 610 meters, and typically features a black dial with luminous hour markers.
For collectors, the reference 1665 is notable for its functional design and its place in the evolution of professional dive watches. Early examples, often referred to as "Double Red Sea-Dweller" (DRSD) due to two lines of red text on the dial, are particularly sought after. Later versions feature all-white text. The presence of the helium escape valve and its robust construction make it a distinct and historically important piece for those interested in the development of specialized timekeeping instruments.
as i'm heavily into birth year watches can you tell me what year your piece is please. i know nothing about the seadweller so it would be good to see how far back they go. best Graham
My watch and I were born in 1983, it has a 8.29m serial number. I think the last year for the matte dial sea-dwellers was 1984 (someone please correct me if i am wrong). As far as I remember reading the 666 was produced from about 1978 onwards and then switched to the gloss dial version later on. I think the first few years of its introduction saw Rolex offer it alongside the 1665 for sale (I have seen submariner booklets with both models side by side). I hope this helps, Tim
Welcome to the Evil Club, Tim. You will discover a great watch, with Vintage Character and Modern virtues. Best of both worlds. If your first step is a Sub, then ytour 2d step will be a GMT, but through your words, I feel that you've been bitten ,yet. Welcome to the Evil World, my friend. Best, Nicolas
thanks for that Tim, a lot of brands Rolex included and particularly Patek use use numbers for their models which just drives me mad with confusion. it means nothing to me when somebody says theyΒve just bought a 5435. you need to be heavily into the brand to know what they are talking about which i think is why my favourite brand is really Omega. they have names for everything so we know where we are best G
I can understand. I think I would normally be in your camp but half my day is spent looking at numbers so I think I actually remember the numbers easier! Do you have birth year watches then? I must admit, although a minor detail I think its quite a special one, I'm sure everybody is a bit sentimental deep down...watch collectors probably more so than usual Tim
I wonder if the designers really considered these virtues when releasing the watch?? I see it as an interesting bridge from the past to the future... Kind of the opposite of all the "heritage" or "new vintage" watches that are coming out now I guess. I am certain I made the right choice for my first Rolex (the pics of yours helped persuade me, thanks!)... How can anyone not want a GMT after the pics that have been going up here the past few weeks. Some really stunning examples, seriously! Maybe
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →