Rolex GMT Master 1675 Gold
Collection

Rolex GMT Master 1675 Gold "Concorde" Revelation

By amanico · Jul 15, 2015 · 38 replies
amanico
WPS member · Rolex forum
38 replies14734 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Nicolas, known as amanico, shares a deeply personal horological revelation, challenging his long-held aversion to gold watches. His candid account of encountering a Rolex GMT Master 1675 in yellow gold, particularly the rare "Concorde" variant, offers a compelling narrative on how a single watch can shift a collector's entire perspective. This piece explores the allure of an unexpected reference and the evolution of taste within the collecting community.

A provocative title, for a huge revelation, and a very interesting watch. 

Yes, I am not a fan of colored gold watches, but you know, here, at PuristSPro, we have many evils as friends, who are always willing to widen your horizons, and feed your appetite. 

Me? A Colored Gold Rolex? No way! Not even in my maddest dreams after a looooong dinner drinking some excellent wine. 

Tsss, come on, you can try whatever you want, you will not catch me, here...

What I thought... 

Till.... Our dear Bill came with two Yellow Gold GMT Master. One more modern, and this special one, which was in production for what... One year? Two years, circa 1968? 

Here it is... 









What caught me by surprise was the coolness of this GMT Master. 

I know a lot of steel GMT Masters, from the 6542 to the 16750, or 16700 / 710. But one like this... This is my first in the real / on the wrist experience. 

Just a bit show off, but not too much, very cool with a white linen shirt and a pair of jeans, quite convincing, I must say. 

And, cherries on the cake, this set of hands, very un-Rolex + the brown insert. 

Only idiots never change their mind... 

Best,

Nicolas



This message has been edited by MTF on 2015-07-15 08:52:30

About the Rolex GMT Ref. 1675

The GMT-Master reference 1675 is a significant model in the brand's history, representing an evolution from earlier GMT-Master references. It was produced for an extended period, allowing for numerous dial, bezel, and hand variations throughout its production run. This reference is notable for its introduction of crown guards, enhancing the watch's robustness and contributing to its distinct profile. It solidified the GMT-Master's design language, which would influence subsequent generations.

This reference features a 40mm case, available in stainless steel, yellow gold, or a two-tone combination of steel and yellow gold. It is powered by the automatic Caliber 1575, a chronometer-certified movement known for its reliability and a power reserve of approximately 42 hours. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal and offers a water resistance of 50 meters, suitable for everyday wear. The bidirectional rotating bezel, typically with an aluminum insert, displays a 24-hour scale.

For collectors, the 1675 is highly sought after due to its long production period and the resulting variety of configurations, including different dial types (gilt, matte), hand styles, and bezel colors (Pepsi, all-red, all-black). Its four-digit reference number and acrylic crystal are key characteristics that define it as a vintage Rolex. The reference appeals to those interested in the historical development of the GMT-Master line and the nuances of vintage watch collecting.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal. 1575
Case
Yellow Gold
Diameter
40mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
50m
Crystal
Acrylic

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
LE
Le Monde Edmond
Jul 15, 2015

Nicolas - thank you for sharing. I had a similar experience with gold. But in life you learn, try, learn some more and then realise that what you once thought unacceptable and not fitting with your style, values and perception actually fits quite well if looked at from a different angle and for the right occasion. Gold has something powerful, warm and soothing. This example you show is beautiful and Bill (once again) has surprised us with something rare and special. I have never seen those hands

AM
amanico
Jul 15, 2015

Thanks for your feedback, Edmond. Best, Nicolas

MA
Mark in Paris
Jul 15, 2015

This is something I noticed quite frequently in watch collecting. The colored gold Rolexes reminded me of 80's styling for a long while but I've been looking with more appeal to two-tone or full gold Submariners and GMTs lately. Another proof that taste can evolve as time goes by, as long as we come across interesting watches. Cheers, Mark

CI
cisco
Jul 15, 2015

Gold... and full gold moreover ! You ! :) GMT in Gold is super cool, especially that brown/bordeaux one. Same for the 1680 in Gold, it is as extreme as it is cool imho. Special pieces, a Gold GMT simply make sense for your love of GMTs. For the full Gold, as I have one and wear it regulary. First reaction: I put it on strap, I will never wear that bracelet. Second step: put back the bracelet, for fun, and it was winter, no one sees under your sleeve :) Third step: I looooove that bracelet, it fi

AM
amanico
Jul 15, 2015

Yes, maybe it is due to the fact that GMT Masters are among my fav watches, maybe because I started this hobby with a GMT Master... But honestly, I couldn't expect such a positive reaction, once on my wrist... I was thinking that it was maybe time for me to consult my psychiatre... ;) I love your three steps descripition. Very accurate, and not only for gold bracelets... Best, and thanks for your input, I feel less alone. :) Nicolas

BI
Bill
Jul 15, 2015

I went throught the dame thinking ad uou and many of friends here. I found like you tgere is room for a gold Rolex in one's collection. I liked this one for two readons the gmt side which as Nicolas is one i love and the second was the rare wuality of this model with the concorde hands and it seems weget the name concorde hands from the Concorde jet and pilot association. One picture for the summer rush. Bill Rolex 1675 concorde

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 38 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →