
Echi, a seasoned collector, shares a candid account of his journey with the Rolex Submariner 14060M, a watch often considered a horological benchmark. His experience delves into the emotional complexities of the hunt, ownership, and eventual parting with a highly coveted reference. This article explores why even a 'grail' watch might not resonate as expected, offering valuable insights into the subjective nature of collecting.


The Rolex Sea-Dweller reference SD43 represents the 43mm variant within the Sea-Dweller collection, produced from 2017 to present. This reference features enhanced water resistance capabilities of 1,220 meters (4,000 feet), positioning it as a professional diving instrument within Rolex's sport watch lineup.
The watch houses the automatic caliber 3235 movement with 70-hour power reserve in a 43mm stainless steel case. Technical specifications include a black dial, unidirectional rotating black Cerachrom bezel, and sapphire crystal. The timepiece is fitted with an Oyster bracelet and maintains the collection's robust construction standards.
The SD43 appeals to collectors seeking substantial case dimensions and enhanced water resistance in a contemporary Rolex diving watch. The 43mm sizing and current production status make this reference accessible within the Sea-Dweller range, offering modern technical specifications for both professional diving applications and collection purposes.
I had SM 2254.50 long-time ago. IMHO the build quality ia excellent, veru comfortable on wrist. Nice alternating brushed and polished finish, way more attractive than Sub. The only thing Sub wins is about the movement. The caliber 1120 in 2254.50 is reliable and OK. Given all consideration, i prefer Omega anyday.
And I agree with your reference to YMMV. It’s true with a good many things in life.
The dial is very much my taste, and even if it is a t bone steak on the wrist, it reminds me the feeling of the 372 when you wear it. I will get it, one day, for sure. I just have to go forward with all my Alpine modifications, and believe me, that kills the wallet, a bit.
I’m almost convinced to experience it. But i want to try the 41 to see if it sits high. I dunno why they can’t reduce the height. The ETA ones might be the way to go at 13mm in height.
Watch collecting is about the community. Sometimes we value experiences over keeping the stuff. I think you let is go because of the right reasons, and the experience is priceless. This is a beautiful story!
I can share the sentiment that in some (or many) cases the chase is as good as the catch, and sometimes (like in this case) it’s better. For me, I have a Sea-Dweller which was my first Rolex. I find the Subs or the same era (5-digit) always fall short of the SD on the wrist and don’t seem anywhere near as appealing. And if one is comparing or choosing between two similar watches (black dial, black bezel) the SD wins always for me. I think this is why my Subs do not look like my SD (Kermit and Hu
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 32 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →