
Alfihar, a seasoned collector, shares his journey into acquiring a Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller. His post delves into the unexpected allure of the larger reference 116660, a model he initially deemed incompatible with his wrist size. This article explores Alfihar's detailed decision-making process between the 116660 and 126660, offering valuable insights for collectors considering these robust dive watches.


The Rolex Submariner reference 114060 represents a significant evolution of the no-date Submariner line, introduced in 2012. This reference is distinguished by its ceramic bezel insert and the "Maxi Case," which features broader lugs and crown guards compared to previous generations, giving it a more substantial presence on the wrist while retaining the classic 40mm diameter. It succeeded the reference 14060M and brought modern material science and design updates to a beloved tool watch. This model is notable for its clean, symmetrical dial, free of a date window and cyclops lens.
This reference features a 40 mm Oyster case crafted from 904L stainless steel, known for its exceptional corrosion resistance. The case houses the Rolex Caliber 3130, a self-winding mechanical movement entirely developed and manufactured by Rolex, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The watch is fitted with a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and is water-resistant to 300 meters (1,000 feet), secured by a Triplock winding crown. The unidirectional rotatable bezel is equipped with a black Cerachrom insert, made from a hard, corrosion-resistant ceramic.
For collectors, the 114060 is appreciated for its blend of traditional Submariner aesthetics with contemporary robustness and materials. It appeals to those who prefer the uncluttered look of a no-date dial and the enhanced durability of a ceramic bezel. Its production run from 2012 to 2020 makes it a relatively modern reference, yet it is now discontinued, having been replaced by the 41mm reference 124060. This reference is often considered a modern classic, bridging the gap between vintage proportions and contemporary Rolex engineering.
Despite the fact I was offered to try both at the same time! Several reasons motivated my choice: - Consistency: The 116660 is complementary to my 114060 and my 116600 ... - Confort : the differences while wearing the 11 and the 12 are not that important ... even if the 12 is, I must admit it, a little more pleasant on the wrist. - End links : I finally prefer the end links of the 116660 ... visually, because I feel that on the 11 the massive side of the watch stands out more. - Size : The large
Has me thinking of psychology....
The deep sea born in 2008 is the most innovative diver in Rolex history. I think the 116660 is better than 126660. I prefer the old bracelet. This is the limit of Rolex, to hope that with every little change its audience follows and is happy. Not for me...
I also prefer the old bracelet, the end links, the global look of the 116660... and the black dial !
Finally, despite its better caliber, I don't like the 126660 ... for different reasons (Lack of consistency with my serial : 114060 and 116600 ; Less attraction for the new end links ; New Oyster is too large for my wrist, Rendering of the watch seems more massive with the 116660, ...). This test with the bracelet adjusted to my wrist and the quality of the piece finally convince me. After usual discussions, we agree and the 116660 is mine. I know that the 116660 has already been seen, I know it
I had a 116660 since 2008 and found it to be just fine on my 6"/154mm wrist. Very comfortable. I recently changed to the 126660 only because I really wanted the blue dial, for variety. As you can see, I analyzed this quite intensively.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →