Rolex D-Blue Sea-Dweller First Impressions
Review

Rolex D-Blue Sea-Dweller First Impressions

By Mizur9999 · Nov 10, 2015 · 24 replies
Mizur9999
WPS member · Rolex forum
24 replies6728 views4 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Mizur9999 shares his initial impressions of the Rolex D-Blue Sea-Dweller, focusing on its striking dial and surprising wearability. This article offers a personal perspective on how a watch's aesthetic can overcome preconceived notions about size and weight, providing valuable insights for collectors considering this distinctive Rolex reference.

24 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

Further to my Sunday's coffee escapade, without further a due, first impressions on a Rolex D-blue DEEPSEA attached.

- Weight and Size - Weighting in a very hefty 220g (almost exactly half a pound!) this is a super heavy weight category; for me at least. By far the heaviest watch I have ever owned.

(Now I know what guys wearing large platinum watches feel like). This is what you call a real wrist presence I guess. After two days I do not mind the weight, the watch constantly reminds you it is where it is supposed to be - on your wrist that is.

- Dial - Lets be honest here, the reason, the only reason I have purchased this watch was its dial. The dial is ...mesmerizing! It makes the whole watch. It is truly unbelievable, absolutely fascinating, it makes you look at it at any given opportunity. You can easily stare at it for 15 min and it is not enough. You just want to look at it again and again. I have looked at it under a magnifying glass and there is no clear cut between blue and black, they just merge into each other flawlessly and unnoticeably. Spectacular!

The old saying is still valid today - Make a dial, sell the watch!

I have passed by a regular Deepsea  more than hundreds of times, never even thinking of acquiring one. Wow, what a power of a dial!

- Water Proofness -  Lets be honest again, I am not a pro diver, this watch will never be any close to 4K underwater, unless I will have dropped it from a cruise ship into the Pacific.

The deepest it will go is a few feet at some swimming pool in Vegas. That said, I do appreciate all the engineering necessary to make it water proof to 4K.

Conclusion -  I am astonished, but the watch is fully wearable, I do not mind its size or weight at all.  That comes from a guy that  considers  a 40mm watch BIG.

- Glass - The glass is REFLECTIVE, very difficult to take pictures as the glass reflects light back. Maybe it has got something to do with its thickness  - an unbelievable 5,5 mm.(This is more than double your regular window glass panel). Stunning again!

















This message has been edited by Mizur9999 on 2015-11-10 15:01:01

About the Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 Ref. 116600

The Sea-Dweller reference 116600 marked the return of the 40mm case size for the model, a dimension that had been absent from the Sea-Dweller lineup for some time. This reference reintroduced several classic Sea-Dweller design elements, distinguishing it from its larger contemporary, the Sea-Dweller 4000. It was produced for a relatively short period, making it a notable transitional model within the brand's professional tool watch offerings.

This reference features a stainless steel case measuring 40mm in diameter and 15.3mm in thickness. It is equipped with a unidirectional rotating bezel made of black ceramic with a 60-minute graduation. The watch is powered by the automatic caliber 3135, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the black dial, which includes a date complication without the cyclops lens, a characteristic feature of the Sea-Dweller line.

Appealing to collectors who appreciate traditional proportions and the technical capabilities of a professional dive watch, the 116600 is recognized for its blend of heritage design and modern materials. Its limited production run contributes to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a Sea-Dweller with a more classic case size and specific aesthetic details, such as the matte-like black dial and the absence of the cyclops over the date.

Specifications

Caliber
3135
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
1220m
Crystal
Sapphire crystal

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
LU
Luis6
Nov 10, 2015

Envy you and those who have meatier wrists.

MI
Mizur9999
Nov 10, 2015

I would not hesitate to try one if you could. I would not consider my wrist particularly large, quite to the contrary medium sized at best. Yet the watch sits on my wrist just perfectly fine. The biggest watch I have worn until now was a 40mm GMT. I know it sounds strange, but I think that the watch wears smaller than it actually is. Thickness is another issue - it is really, really thick - difficult to wear with a dress shirt. Best regards.

LU
Luis6
Nov 10, 2015

I've owned the 116600 sea-Dweller, and thickness is an issue. It felt nice at first, but after a few hours of activity, the thickness would make me feel a little bit uncomfortable. The DEEPSEA is even thicker and larger, so I'm afraid that it's probably out of my range.

MI
Mizur9999
Nov 10, 2015

I think that after a while I will only be wearing this watch summer time or on a winter vacations in a sunny place. On a long run the thickness may proof to be too much, and seasonal wear will be the answer. Best again.

AM
amanico
Nov 10, 2015

I totally agree with you, the dial makes this watch. Best, Nicolas

CO
COUNT DE MONET
Nov 11, 2015

Not that it does not look good on you! Saw the "standard" model a few times and it looked good on people. This Cameron edition adds a bit more spice to it with the dial. Enjoy your new purchase. Best Moritz

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →