Collection
Nicolas, known as amanico on WatchProSite, shares his enduring admiration for the Rolex Daytona Zenith ref. 16520, presenting a pristine full-set example from the late 1990s. His post highlights why this particular reference holds a special place in his collection, even among vintage Daytonas. This article delves into the community's shared appreciation for the 16520, exploring its unique appeal and historical context.
The Rolex Cellini reference 16520 is a notable example of the brand's dress watch offerings, distinct from its more robust sport models. This particular reference represents a period where Rolex explored more refined and understated designs, catering to a clientele seeking a timepiece suitable for formal occasions. It stands as a testament to Rolex's versatility in watchmaking, showcasing a different facet of their design philosophy compared to their Oyster Perpetual line.
This reference features a case crafted from stainless steel, measuring 40mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, specifically the Caliber 4030, which is based on the Zenith El Primero. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 50 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the dial, and the watch is rated for a water resistance of 100 meters. The fixed tachymeter bezel is a characteristic feature.
For collectors, the reference 16520 appeals to those interested in the evolution of Rolex's dress watch designs and their use of external base movements. Its production run from 1988 to 2000 places it within a specific era of Rolex manufacturing. The black dial and Oyster bracelet contribute to its overall aesthetic, making it a recognizable piece within the Cellini collection.
This shot should brighten up your day ;-))
The sub dials slowly change to a pale caramel.
I also remember people thinking I was raving mad 20 years ago telling people to buy as many 16520’s as they could. At this time they were £3.5-5k. Those were the days. There are also a few who tell me they are happy they listened to me. Love the 16520 like you my friend and it is also my favourite Daytona with the 6263 a very very close second. Here is my 16520 one of the very first made from 1988. M.
It’s not worth that. Kick your leg will suffice. I’ve kicked myself many many times over my watch collecting journey. Mostly for selling a watch M.
At least I think that now. At the time logic said it would be redundant to have two. Damm logic.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
