Collection
I am not really a Daytona guy, but I must admit a big weakness for the 16520. A really cool chronograph, which I prefer, the purists will kill me, to the vintage ones. With the 16520, there is: - A feeling of quality - A blend of modern and vintage touches Which make me love it so much. So, I wear i
The Rolex Cellini reference 16520 is a notable example of the brand's dress watch offerings, distinct from its more robust sport models. This particular reference represents a period where Rolex explored more refined and understated designs, catering to a clientele seeking a timepiece suitable for formal occasions. It stands as a testament to Rolex's versatility in watchmaking, showcasing a different facet of their design philosophy compared to their Oyster Perpetual line.
This reference features a case crafted from stainless steel, measuring 40mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, specifically the Caliber 4030, which is based on the Zenith El Primero. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 50 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the dial, and the watch is rated for a water resistance of 100 meters. The fixed tachymeter bezel is a characteristic feature.
For collectors, the reference 16520 appeals to those interested in the evolution of Rolex's dress watch designs and their use of external base movements. Its production run from 1988 to 2000 places it within a specific era of Rolex manufacturing. The black dial and Oyster bracelet contribute to its overall aesthetic, making it a recognizable piece within the Cellini collection.
I just bought the new version with the white dial but must admit that the 16520 is nicer. Perhaps I should take a look at 16520 with black dial. It would go well with my morning coffee. Best, Kari
Yes, a black 16520 would be nice.... I too think about getting one to make the pair... Best, Nicolas
Lovely pics, especially the second one: two icons of our times... Ciao Nico!!! massi
I do agree with your statement, definitely. So, if the Purists kill you, I should be killed as well then we can both play chess in the cemetery using the Daytona 16520 as stop watch:) Cheers my friend Francois
.. Up to know I've always shied away from Daytonas, guess mostly because of wallet-reasons, so far, and I suppose, it's sort of a minefield also.. I guess before that I'll rather approach a Freccione/ 1655 .. ;) .. But I'm on a light (watch-) diet at the moment, without doubt recurrence will happen in due time(s) Thanks for the share, And Best hs
Not even a small place for a SHOM? ;) Best, my friend. Nicolas
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 25 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
