Discussion
Squishytwenty7 presents a classic collector's dilemma: trading a modern Rolex GMT-Master II 'Root Beer' (CHNR) for a vintage GMT-Master Ref. 1675. This decision highlights the perennial debate within the watch community regarding the merits of contemporary horological advancements versus the historical charm and character of vintage references. Squishytwenty7's query invites readers to weigh in on a trade that pits cutting-edge manufacturing against time-honored design.
The GMT-Master reference 1675 is a significant model in the brand's history, representing an evolution from earlier GMT-Master references. It was produced for an extended period, allowing for numerous dial, bezel, and hand variations throughout its production run. This reference is notable for its introduction of crown guards, enhancing the watch's robustness and contributing to its distinct profile. It solidified the GMT-Master's design language, which would influence subsequent generations.
This reference features a 40mm case, available in stainless steel, yellow gold, or a two-tone combination of steel and yellow gold. It is powered by the automatic Caliber 1575, a chronometer-certified movement known for its reliability and a power reserve of approximately 42 hours. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal and offers a water resistance of 50 meters, suitable for everyday wear. The bidirectional rotating bezel, typically with an aluminum insert, displays a 24-hour scale.
For collectors, the 1675 is highly sought after due to its long production period and the resulting variety of configurations, including different dial types (gilt, matte), hand styles, and bezel colors (Pepsi, all-red, all-black). Its four-digit reference number and acrylic crystal are key characteristics that define it as a vintage Rolex. The reference appeals to those interested in the historical development of the GMT-Master line and the nuances of vintage watch collecting.
They are such different watches, that they may as well be from different brands. The four digit is very tool-watchy. The CHNR is very pretty and finely-finished, not to mention the extra tech in the movement. I pity you for being in such a conundrum
Much more style and better looking imho
..however, I love the Oystersteel Everose 126711CHNR
I think itโs easy for some to wax poetic about these heavily used vintage Subs, but at the end of the day with this trade, youโre left with a rattletrap and stretched bracelet with a cheap stamped clasp, on a watch head that is likely over polished and a beat up aluminum bezel. I think youโd quickly miss the quality of the two tone GMT in short order and wonder why you traded down
I would keep the CHNR (Root Beer) vs the 1675. For a Daytona, that's a different situation!
Please show us a picture of the particular watch.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 36 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
