Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 Steel vs. Rose Gold

patekova · 2019-01-08T13:10:51Z

Compare Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 in steel vs. rose gold. Collectors discuss versatility, aesthetics, and character differences.

patekova

WPS member · Patek Philippe forum

22 replies4352 views2 photos

Patekova initiates a compelling discussion comparing the Patek Philippe Nautilus Ref. 5711 in steel and rose gold, offering a deeply personal perspective on their distinct characters. This post delves into how material choices profoundly impact a watch's versatility, aesthetic, and overall appeal to a collector.

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

What I wrote below is pure personal opinion on my part. It is strictly an expression of how I feel, nothing more and nothing less:

The steel version is the ultimate sporty, casual watch. Goes well with any outfit from shorts to jeans to business casual to dress to black tie. A watch for all seasons and reasons. Exceptionally attractive, but beautiful ... not quite.

The rose on the other hand, especially because of the color of the metal, is not so versatile. (White metal watches to me offer the ultimate versatility.) The rose calls out for either casual wear with colors that sorta complement the watch, or dress wear. Of course if one goes to the beat of one’s own drummer one can wear it with any outfit or style of dress. Why be bound by convention? My view - anything goes!

The rose is strikingly beautiful with the warm color of the case perfectly matched with the brown color graduated dial. Chic and light in weight versus say a gold Daytona. Relatively subdued compared to say a gold Submariner. For me it is truly captivating to look at. A very, very pretty watch. Hey, a guy can wear a “pretty” watch - no?

Sport watches and steel make the most sense. When I think of sport watches in gold I think proceed with caution, both in buying and wearing and be prepared for scratches.

That said, why not go for gold and sport if it appeals to you. 5711 in rose appeals to me tremendously.

I am interested in what my fellow Forum members feel about the steel and rose versions of 5711 as well as other Nautilus models offering a gold variant.

Best, patekova

About the Patek Philippe Complications Ref. 5711

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5711/1A is a specific configuration within the Complications model line. This particular reference is identified by its serial number 5914840, with a movement number 6084863.

The watch is presented in a stainless steel case, indicated by the "/1A" suffix. No specific details regarding the crystal material or movement architecture are provided.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking a Patek Philippe Complications model in stainless steel. Its specific serial and movement numbers are documented for identification purposes.

Specifications

Caliber: 26-330 S C

Case: Stainless steel

Diameter: 40mm

Dial: Blue, White

Water Resist.: 120m

Crystal: Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

While steel sports watches are highly valued, the rose gold Patek Philippe 5711 is considered one of the most stunning watches by some collectors, despite preferring steel for other sports models.
The rose gold 5711 with its brown graduated dial is described as a 'pretty' and 'spectacular' watch, challenging conventional notions of masculinity in watch aesthetics.
The steel 5711 is seen as a stylish tool watch, while the rose gold version makes a more pronounced 'statement'.
The rose gold 5711 is perceived as less conservative and better suited for certain skin tones, particularly with a tan, creating a wonderful contrast.
The rose gold version requires a specific style to 'carry off', making it less universally versatile than the steel variant.
Rare platinum 5711 models, including those with gem-set bezels (rubies, emeralds), exist, though their exact reference numbers and production figures are less commonly known.

The Discussion

Cpt Scarlet

Jan 8, 2019

Fashion plays a big part in this..

I like the rose gold version. I has it’s own style that you need to be able to carry off. The steel version is far less challenging.

patekova

Jan 8, 2019

True. If I were to choose one and only one it would be steel. [nt]

Cpt Scarlet

Jan 8, 2019

But if you already have the steel ? [nt]

patekova

Jan 8, 2019

Then it is an appealing option. Of course, there is also 5712 steel - a great watch! Similar thin case to 5711 and complicated. [nt]

Onemorewatch

Jan 8, 2019

Gold all the way!

I am a proponent of sports watches being in SS although have a few white metal PM models in which to compliment a fairly stellar collection. In the high end market of AP and PP I’d normally take SS over PM indeed only have eyes for SS for the Royal Oak which I own, incidentally I also own a Patek 5990. That said I have tried both 5711s and the RG version is quite possibly the most stunning watch I have ever had on my wrist. The break through in marketing SS as uber luxury lies solely with AP and

patekova

Jan 8, 2019

Thank you for your well presented and interesting viewpoint. It is surprising to me that often in vintage and modern sports watches, steel despite

the higher production numbers can sell for as much or more than gold.